this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45399 readers
812 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

The self-reference in this was expected but somehow also the perfect cherry on top

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We need to eat. We don't need tol take joy in aninal deaths. These are different things and the meme is dumb.

[–] James_Fortis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I'm vegan btw. The meme is making fun of people who eat for taste pleasure and not any other type :)

[–] spacesatan@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Except you don't need to eat animals and so it is the same. You're killing animals for your entertainment, just because you eat them after that doesn't change anything.

[–] wakumul@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

you don't know what they need. and I seriously doubt they are killing for entertainment. I doubt they kill anything at all.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

People have eaten meat for thousands of years. That's been a matter of survival, not entertainment. But my comment was about people taking joy in killing, which is what the meme is about, not taking joy in eating,. I appreciate your zeal but I'd prefer you to not ascribe to me arguments I didn't make

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I grew up on a farm, I've killed and slaughtered my own food my whole life and I always felt good about eating meat because of that fact.

As I get older I'm really starting to hate killing things, I don't want to end a life at all. My couple of vegetarian days might turn into a whole lifestyle.

[–] James_Fortis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You've got this! There are a ton of benefits to going plant-based. Dominion is a great documentary to show how most (~90%) are treated, which emphasizes the importance for us to shift away (it doesn't sound like the way you did it was as bad as this, but this is the info that made me swap away recently).

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh hey, a 1-day-old account posting 6 vegan posts in 1 hour to unrelated communities. I’ve seen this one before.

[–] James_Fortis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey! I made this content and was made aware of Lemmy by a friend two days ago. I decided to join and wanted to enter with a bang by sharing some of my OC.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, Social Media Manipulation 101

I've seen an increasing trend of vеgаns doing this especially on lemmy

[–] HeyHo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, those awful vegans pushing their agenda for their own gains. Make ME aware of MY CHOICE to pay for animal abuse and torture?! Blatant manipulation!

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no one is paying for animal abuse or torture

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Exactly! My ancestors didnt pay for slavery, they just wanted cotton. Everyone need cotton, right? I mean they wouldve harvested the cotton themselves, but it was way cheaper from neighboring farmers for whatever reason. That didnt concern them though, they had enough prpblems!

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The whole taste argument completely ignores nutrition.

Why don’t you only eat potatoes? Do you derive taste pleasure from B12 supplements?

Attaching a system of morality to a diet is just religion.

I maintain that veganism is just halal/kosher for atheists/agnostics.

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Attaching a system of mortality to a diet is just religion

... what? I'm sorry, but this simply doesn't make sense at all. By this logic what is wrong with cannibalism? Attaching a system of morality to that diet would just be a religion right? And I'm sure eating human meat has all kinds of nutrients.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nothing is inherently wrong with cannibalism.

I’m not a moral realist. So I don’t believe in moral facts I.e. that murder is ‘wrong’ or being charitable is ‘right’

It’s kid stuff (IMO) to believe in mystical rights and wrongs of the universe. The universe does not care one iota that you cease to exist tomorrow or if all humans were to become extinct (IMO).

If you disagree please point me to the source of your morals, how do you know what’s right and what’s wrong?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who here is claiming that there are moral facts? Of course morals are constructs of human culture, but that doesn't make them less important. Morals are essentially what we have learned to be important rules for good, healthy societies. Humans who abide by the idea that it is "wrong" to kill another human are far more compatible in a community than ones who do not. These concepts have developed over a very long time, which is why we tend to "know" when things are wrong (eg feel bad, guilty conscious, etc). One of these "rules" is that needlessly inflicting pain on intelligent animals is wrong. Similarly, causing unnecessary damage to the environment is wrong. The context of climate change is quite new, but the principle is the same.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

One of these “rules” is that needlessly inflicting pain on intelligent animals is wrong.

that is not universal

who gets to define need

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Obviously the observer decides for themselves what they think is needed. I didn't think it would be controversial to observe that people tend to dislike/have an aversion to hurting intelligent animals for no reason.

Not everyone necessarily feels this, but many people do. Enough for us as a society to largely ban/shun things like dog fights, bull fights, circus animals, animal torture videos, etc

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The experiences of animals are real and matter. Their suffering is identical in nature to your own. Your moral perspective demands that you deny or ignore these facts. If you can deny that an animal's experience has any value, you can do the same to a human.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you’ve never killed a mosquito, right? Or a spider? Ants, perhaps?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a bad faith argument, similar to saying "so you've never left a light on all day?" To someone protesting climate change.

The point of veganism (besides the environmental side) is that there is far too much unnecessary suffering caused to animals; complex and intelligent animals, because of the meat industry. Of course humans will probably always cause death and suffering to animals and even other humans, but accepting this and taking it as a reason for "why should I care at all then" is ridiculous.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think we are at the point where all of humanity can refrain from meat. Maybe most Americans but we should maybe collectively decide this is the goal before pursuing it.

Being incendiary is a strategy that only had small short term gains. Looking at th big picture more people need to understand the argument and it can't be, "you should feel bad." At least not until you've established the expectations and clear reasons why they exist outside of one's own personal judgement.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why can't we?? Meat is a luxury product!! The only reason you can afford it at all is because I subsidize it so heavily with my taxes. It is made by refining cheap, safe, plentiful plant food using the bodies of animals to create a toxic, addictive, scarce luxury good. In that process, MOST OF THE NUTRIENTS ARE LOST. If we all stopped eating meat, we would have such an overabundance of food, we would have to stop farming more than half the land we are currently farming for plants.

Now tell me why YOU can't stop being cruel and violent against the kindest, gentlest creatures on the planet? Because even if you can come up with a tortured hypothetical reason some unlikely hypothetical person can't, if you can, then what you are doing is atrocity.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 months ago

Not that I was going to listen to you anyway, but the entire way you’re going about this just makes you look like a dick.

Also, accusing me of being cruel and violent for buying a slab of meat off the shelf is laughably stupid.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can deny the importance of human experience (the heat death of the universe will erase all traces of our existence and impact) without wanting to kill humans right now.

How did you conclude the experiences of animals matter?

How do you know animals are having experiences?

How do you know human experiences matter?

I don’t claim to have any answers to the above but I’ve never heard a satisfactory answer to these questions other than ‘I just believe it is so’ and if it boils down to my belief versus your belief I have to conclude that neither one of us actually has any idea.

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dont know why you call it your moral system, when your system apparently is that the earth is supreme, humans dont matter, therefore anything that happens is okay. Morals are a societal thing, if you dont care about society then what's the point?

How do you apply this system to your own actions? Just anything goes cause it doesnt matter?

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

I agree, morals are a societal thing and right now it’s perfectly socially acceptable to eat meat.

How I apply this to my own actions is by conforming to the made up rules of society because that seems to keep me alive.

If I lived in a vegan society and it was not socially acceptable to eat meat I likely wouldn’t.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you can deny that an animal's experience has any value, you can do the same to a human.

values are subjective

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And yours are inconsistent. Is there a problem with people pointing that out?

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no one can value everything the same.. of course they are inconsistent

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't say they had the same value. I said they had value. Consuming them for hedonistic pleasure is only ethically consistent with the view that animals have effectively zero or even negative intrinsic value.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

nothing has intrinsic value

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

All of your efforts at self-preservation seem to disagree.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Okay? So?

Being cruel and violent to innocent creatures requires that you learn to suspend your empathy. Being cruel and violent to innocent creatures EVERY SINGLE DAY requires that you main your empathy, to actually injure yourself and impair your ability to be empathetic AT ALL.

To respond to your apparent non sequitur, I value compassion and empathy. Don't you?

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

I value compassion and empathy

everyone does..not everyone has a problem with eating animals.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

want to see a westerner have a full on tantrum? Suggest to them that their actions are not always morally neutral

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The smug, always morally neutral easterners:

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look up the prevalence of veganism

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The smug, eternally morally superior vegan:

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, Vegans are morally superior, that's a solved question.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thry certainly earn the smug reputation

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

They're better than you and it should be known.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah, yummy meat. I like it a lot. Sometimes i salt it than dry it myself, and god, does it taste delicious. I might be bothered by the cruelty of all this meat industry, but guess what, if i were to choose, i'd rather be a farm pig. Anything actually that does not comprehend the cruelty of this reality, and i'm not talking about farms here. Also, unlike most of us they go away quickly.

P.S. fyi, latest studies show that plants might also feel the pain. Sorry to disappoint you guys, but it seems like we are just doomed to bring more suffering in this world. You better find a way to cope with this before it became more researched.

[–] James_Fortis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Note that an estimated 90% of global farm animals are factory farmed, and are fed monocrops like corn and soy that humans can eat. It's about 10 times more efficient to eat the plants directly than the animals due to Trophic Levels, so if you're worried about plants feeling pain you'd reduce their pain by eating them directly instead of their inefficient middlemen.