this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6794 readers
8 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The government should partner with McDonald’s and offer a free double cheeseburger with proof of voting.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Election Day should be a national holiday to give folks a chance to vote.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who would run the polling stations and run public transit?

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Those deemed necessary could be given a day off to early vote.

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You don’t have public transit on national holidays and Sundays? Next you are going to ask who is going to work in hospitals and restaurants

[–] Vlixz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe a really dumb question and I'm not from the US but why did Hilary lose in 2016 when she had more votes than Donald Trump? That doesn't really make any sense to me

[–] LMagicalus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Because we have this stupid thing called the electoral college. Basically, each state has a certain number of votes, based (roughly) on population (its a whole other issue), and the states' votes are cast for whoever won the most votes within their state (barring rogue electors and the few states that use proportional representation for votes.) Theres a total of 538 votes, and all that matters is winning more than half of them. This has made the winner of the popular vote lose the election 5 times (though in 1824, it went to the house of representatives for a final decision because no one had a majority.)

To summarize: not a dumb question, VERY dumb answer.

[–] fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I would also like to see a similar graph for mid-term elections. Do the winners even get 10% of the eligible votes?

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

c/dataishorrifyinganddepressing

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it makes you feel any better, the trend looks like more people are voting as time goes on.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

As crazy as it is, Donald Trump appears to have been the single largest motivator to vote in American history. Either him or Covid.

He has definitely motivated me to vote twice, and for the rest of my life I won’t miss an election. Seriously. I had voted before, but I’d sit it out if I was too busy or I didn’t particularly like either candidate.

I have happily voted for Mr. or Ms. Not Trump twice. Now I also have to vote for Mr or Ms Not Influenced by Trump every chance I get too.

[–] MacStache@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I've never understood why there is a voting system where the one with most votes can lose.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They usually justify it by saying it's to prevent the tyranny of the majority (two wolves and a sheep biting on dinner).

But a case could be made that it's a way to keep the elite entrenched.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The founders were a gentleman's club. Which is basically a fraternity. They made up rules that made sense to a bunch of frat boy farmers with enlightenment libraries.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I wouldn’t call them farmers. Partly because a variety of wealthy professions were represented and mostly because the ones who called themselves farmers didn’t do any farming, they forced enslaved people to farm for them.