this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
41 points (100.0% liked)

News

29007 readers
4821 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

This dude got a bunch of kids killed in Samoa because he pushed an anti-vax misinformation campaign against the MMR vaccine.

People stopped giving their kids the vaccine.

An outbreak happened, and kids died. He denies any connection.

He got kids killed.

So there is no “oops” for believing online conspiracy stuff in his case when he does shit like that.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

This guy claims his brain worms left him too fucked up to run his own finances, but he wants to run the country.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

after reading this article, it makes a lot of sense that joe rogan said RFK jr was the "only candidate that makes sense"

“Somebody will send me something and I’ll go ‘Holy cow, did you see this?’,” he said, describing how he credulously forwards fake content to his children, only for them to have to correct him. (Kennedy said that, unlike him, his children can identify fake images “immediately.”)

this reads exactly like something joe rogan would do

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Joe Rogan just wants funny shit to happen. He doesn't give a shit about how the country is run. The only reason he's not picking Trump now is because it's less funny now than it was when he beat Hillary.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

That just screams boomer to me. It reminds me that growing up, my parents told me to not believe everything I read on the internet. If only they would take their own advice...

[–] Eiri@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, generally speaking he's an idiot, but in this specific instance I like that he's admitting to his fault.

We all fall for misinformation at least sometimes. It's time to stop shaming people for falling for it and doing something about the issue.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

The problem with him is that he then pushes that misinformation without vetting it first.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

But please, continue to try and join the world stage full of master manipulators.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Helps to be relatable to his voters.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If this is the alternative to the two-party system, I think we're fucked.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's not the alternative he's the result. If legitimate 3rd party candidates had a real shot he would've never gotten this far.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I suppose, but every time there's been a third party candidate that has gained any traction, he's been terrible. Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, Ralph Nader... even Donald Trump himself made a third party attempt in 2000 and got a lot further than he should have.

And then there's the Libertarians.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah they're usually plants to draw votes away

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It’s because the two-party system is a systemic problem. Our winner-take-all voting system always punishes similar candidates, so if similar groups don’t form a coalition and choose a single candidate to run for them, they will cannibalize each other and surely lose. So, you inevitably end up with two parties each representing all the factions on one side of the spectrum.

As a result, anybody on the national level who decides to run as a third party candidate (a) doesn’t understand our voting system, (b) is just doing it for the publicity, or (c) is out of their mind.

If we had a different voting system that did not punish similar candidates (like ranked choice), not only would quality third parties be possible, they would be inevitable.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

RFK is just like your idiot uncle. Big uncle energy. Except weirder and without the necessary consequences. Taking weird photos with dead animals.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Speaking as a quirky uncle….

Yeah. I kinda hate you at the moment. The weird phots we take are like, forced perspective things that are fun.

Giant sunfish is on a stringer is a classic

These? Creepy.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

And he wants the nuclear codes?

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 1 points 8 months ago

Here's hoping he sucks enough votes from Trump's campaign, and then gets eaten by a bear.

[–] aloeTGL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

He’s like the creed bratton of politics

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No shit, he’s got the brains of his aunt and uncle.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And he used to have a worm living all up in there too.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From probably raw bear meat

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Mother Jones - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mother Jones:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/robert-f-kennedy-all-the-time-ian-carroll/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. So hes the only honest person running, what's your point?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If someone sends you something that says we landed on Mars and made contact with other life forms, a respectable person researches it before passing that information along as possibly real.. Not send it to people and say "holy cow have you seen this" and then have them respond telling you youve fallen for crazy junk again.

It shows that he incapable of taking care of himself and requires a caretaker.

It's fine to make a mistake, or fall for something, it happens. It should be rare though, especially if you are running to be responsible for the lives of hundreds of millions of people directly, and billions indirectly.