this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
142 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I AGREE, instead Kamala should do what Trump did and give us all multiple stimulus checks. Like how about every month. We can call it "Universal Basic Income."

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

American Basic Income. Don't make it and all weird and European sounding/s

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Veteran approved Freedom Bucks!

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I genuinely wish we lived in the world they fear so much

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know how you end up with communism? You make it so nobody can afford their fucking groceries.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Wait... wasn't he just giving a "press conference" about how grocery prices have gone up? If not price controls, what will hinder price gouging?

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Only he can do it. With big numbers, the best. I mean low

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Only by giving massive amounts of no-strings-attached government money to Smithfield and ConAgra while lightly scolding them about shrinkflation can we address high grocery costs!

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He will simply tell the companies they have to lower the prices, and they will say "no way" and he will say "way".

Problem solved.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, we're looking
Down on Wayne's basement. Only
That's not Wayne's basement.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Weren’t you paying attention? He’s not going to use price controls, he’s going to use container size controls.

It can’t be communist if it’s big!

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

the shrinkflation shall continue until his tiny hands can wrap themselves around a can of diet coke.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Did he actually say that? I just saw the dumbass holding up two sizes of tic tacs and idiotically proclaiming "tHiS iS iNfLaTioN".

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, we're still waiting for the details on that "amazing" healthcare plan him and his team lied about having when they tried to repeal the Affordable Care Act, so I'm sure it's just around the corner!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kamala’s plan is some sort of vague “stop price gouging,” but Trumps plan is even vaguer. His plan was to hold a press conference next to some sausages and say that his administration would lower prices. He gave even fewer specifics.

His actual plans are project 2025.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He has no actual plans beyond "stay out of prison by going to the White House."

Project 2025 is the plan of all the people he's going to appoint if he gets in.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Only words left in the conservative vocabulary: "Socialist" and "communist"

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Surely linking affordable groceries to communism will make affordable groceries less popular rather than communism more popular.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, if cheaper groceries are communist, then I’m ready for my hammer and sickle.

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

then I’m ready

Then WE'RE ready, comrade.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The reason publicly traded companies continually raise prices is the pressure from Wall Street to continually make more money than you did last month, last quarter, last year.

Say you sell 1,000,000 hamburgers and make a 20% profit on it.

Unless you make more money next year, selling that same 1,000,000 hamburgers, Wall Street is going to punish you. They don't care that you're profitable.

You either sell more burgers or raise prices.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. They treat profit like a necessary business expense or a cost, and balance their budgets around it. Which perverts a fundamental of economics.

I'm starting to think the stock market is just a really awful bank that is sometimes also a ponzi scheme.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The stock market IS a ponzi scheme, and the embodiment or everything that's wrong with capitalism. It encourages greed and drives enshittification. It's a system by the wealthy, for the wealthy (like 90% of stock is owned by the richest 10%, and most of that is owned by the top 0.1%). Expectations of infinite growth on a planet with finite resources is insane.

Most of the human population would prefer (and benefit from) less greed, less enshitification, cheaper housing, cheaper groceries, cheaper products — than the possibility to own a share of evilcorp.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Or lower content, or use cheaper content, or fire people and make the people staying work 10% more for the same salary, ... every year.

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thank Jack Welch and Milton Friedman

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

A while back, Exxon set a record for any company in a quarter and everyone was going "Wooo!" and I was like "Well, gas prices are going up then... Think about next quarter and this quarter next year..."

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It is because enough people don’t bother to price shop.

They have to turn inventory or they will quickly go broke.

If you switch to the cheaper option they have to react. If you shrug and pay, they win.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anyone that listens to him is a fucking moron.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Or complicit in the grift to steal more money from working americans. Or a fucking moron!

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

You all heard it hear first, he wants to be the bread man for the Florida region.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh come on. The rhetoric is insane . I live in Florida and price gouging during a hurricane or other emergency is absolutely illegal here, there's a hotline to call if you see it. There is a difference between raising prices because your costs have gone up, and price gouging. If the invisible hand of the market isn't working (big surprise, ha) that's what laws are for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Did he confuse the word consumerist ?

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Isn't he the same guy who's been promising to cut energy costs "in half or less than half," eh?

[–] npz@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I recall this recent quote from him at Bedminster when asked about his campaign strategy: "All I have to do is define her as a Communist or a Socialist or say she will destroy America."

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I think there is a difference between price-fixing and putting a stop to price-gouging.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Well of course paying lower prices is clearly communist /s

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All this looks like a conflict on a stereotypical Middle-Eastern market.

Two sides with the emotion of "munnat" in long words and exaggerated comparisons talking stuff about each other that doesn't make sense, but nobody remembers it should even make sense.

Republicans do more of that, but funny for both.

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's because elections are won on emotions and vibes, not "boring" policies, unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Trump called it "the Maduro plan" and I'm laughing. What an idiot!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›