this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

memes

17255 readers
3173 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they can stop paying their CEO 7 million per year

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That CEO quit earlier this year.

[–] acutfjg@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they can stop paying the next CEO 7 million

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe that CEO will also quit, because other companies offer them a higher salary.

It's so easy to say they should just pay their CEO less. I mean, I get it, it's a ridiculous amount of money that no one needs. But few people, who are qualified for that job, will just do it out of the goodness of their hearts for a salary far below industry standards.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This is predicated on the assumption that a CEOs skill is directly related to their salary.

This may or may not be the case.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But few people, who are qualified for that job

CEOs do nothing. They rake in millions, and hire advisors to tell them what to do

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

When did I say I want to be a parasite? I want to abolish CEOs, not become one of them

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mozilla chose to waste most of it.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right? I don't need AI BS. I just want a solid browser.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean, you don't want an opt-out ad tracker?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What AI bullshit? I didn't get the memo.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no mention of adding AI to the browser. It's just an AI platform or ecosystem for development.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla has a finite amount of money. If they're (as far as I'm concerned) wasting it on AI nonsense, that's less development funds that can go toward Firefox.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know. I think for them it's an opportunity to draw more attention and investments. Especially now with how hot AI is at the moment.

I think people are overreacting a bit.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 1 year ago

While ML does have legit uses in many specific cases, this whole "throw 'AI' into everything" hype/trend is just blockchain all over again. IMO, the ones who are overreacting are the ones swept up in the hype.

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • Mozilla will take money from Microsoft
  • Firefox gets Office 365, Exchange, and Azure AD integration
  • Netflix partners with Microsoft for advanced HD and DRM
  • Microsoft and Mozilla partner to deliver Microsoft-enhanced Firefox for Windows
  • ActiveX 2.0
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I had a good chuckle at how well that all came together.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Okay, Satan.

[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I upvoted you but I wasn't happy about it.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope Mozilla put most of that Google money into index funds or something. At least it didn't go into paying the developers.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't confirmed this but according to this

They didn't

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla chose a stupid business model. 🤷

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe that's not bad for firefox.

Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects and just focus on delivering a good browser.

Algo the lack of google as financial support means they'll rely more on donations, which would mean that they really need to focus on offering a good browser.

I'll gladly donate to firefox if I would see they are really focusing on it.

[–] SankaraStone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mozilla (not Google) got rid of the side projects, increased the CEO's salary, and laid off a bunch of employees during the pandemic. It basically got rid of the innovation that could have made Firefox a faster, more secure, and pleasant experience. Rust and Rust-based Servo, as a replacement for Gecko, were two of those side projects. These are the things Mozilla needs to invest in.

Also, I think Mozilla needs to ask the user upon install what the default search engine should be from a list of search engines including Google, Duck Duck Go, Bing, and Yahoo. Maybe the order of those could be arranged based on how much they're able to finagle from the search engines.

The real monopoly is their control over Chrome. That's what they should be forced to split from the company that owns the search engine. Development and design of Chrome should not and cannot be done by the company that runs the search engine and gets its revenue from ads.

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think in the future I will try to donate like 10 dollars a month for free software that I use, including Firefox, KDE, Thunderbird, Wikipedia, Lemmy, etc.

I think it's very important to support open source financially, because without it we would all be fucked by huge corporations. And I might sound overly anti-capitalist, but I think that most of them should be broken up.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

If I had the money, an extra $5 or so would definitely be something I'd spend monthly on donating to Mozilla/Firefox.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I donate around 5 dollars to Wikipedia every month. Another 5 to Mozilla isn't an issue for me.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just signed up for monthly donations of 5 USD per month. 5.60 USD technically since I also opted to pay the transaction fees.

Suck it.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have nothing to prove to you. Besides, even if I did present it, you wouldn't believe it. Even if I presented it with doxxing information you would note it for future harassment campaigns and also claim you don't believe it.

So... as I said previously... suck it.

5.60 USD to mozilla every month. Not much, but if everyone did it, they would be bigger than google and tell them to eat shit livestream.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your dick dumbass. Not a copy of your fucking bank statement lmfao. Were my lips on my dick sucking emoji face not clear enough?

Ya'll take yourselves way too seriously lol. I'm glad you contributed. I haven't, besides hopefully spurring you on to, in which I'll take some of the credit for it. So you're welcome.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbh I like Gecko but I hate the Mozilla company's recent statements.

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please elaborate or point me in the direction

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mass Layoffs

AI Focus

End of Support status for FireFox on windows older than Windows 10

Removal of many settings such as browser.privateWindowSeparation.enabled

It's a company. Mozilla Foundation has nonprofit status but the Subsidiary Mozilla Corporation is for-profit.

TBH I'm biased af because I just liked it better before all the recent updates.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand why you are about layoffs. They are cutting useless bloat. (VR didn't pan out go figure) Also Windows 7 isn't supported by Microsoft so it doesn't make sense to support it. It isn't even receiving security patches.

From a profitability perspective I think there is lots of potential in privacy tech. The problem is that they keep creating and then discontinuing random stuff.

I don't like Mozilla but the stuff you listed doesn't seem like the problem to me.

[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

laying off the servo staff at least was a mistake

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmywinksthegerbilking@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well then they can start resetting duckduckgo as the default search engine

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

They honestly should partner with DDG. They are in the same industry.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Others will present themselves. Mozilla have been on a downtrend for years. I've heard of a couple of alternatives, but I don't have the experience with any of them. If anyone knows any good Firefox alternatives, please let us know!

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is pretty alright.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

And also based on chrome. That's the thing that people seem to keep ignoring. Your browser options are Firefox or something based on chrome.

[–] MagikMistur@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

I switched to brave anyway.