this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
1484 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Stop using chrome and move to Firefox, also stop using Windows and more to Linux.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Friends don't let friends run Chrome.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Switched to Firefox in 2023 and it's wild how much shit just works now.

[–] feoh@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Totally agree. Many people who keep using Chrome have a VERY outdated view of what Firefox can do. That's a shame, but it's unfortunately an aspect of human nature that negative impressions are SUPER hard to change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Remember like 2 weeks ago when Google's very own ad networks were distributing malware?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

This is the perfect time to go aggressive on telling your friends to switch to Firefox

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not only intrusive ads, intrusive trackers too

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

Using the internet without an adblocker is genuinely dangerous. Everyone really should be using uBlock Origin. Using a web browser that prevents uBlock Origin puts you in danger

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In their eyes they just made 30 million more customers.

Fucking parasites.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (25 children)

They made Firefox a good number of new customers.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 3 months ago (14 children)

I‘m really anxious for firefox as google is the main financier afaik.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (17 children)

It is a worry. I think we might end up needing to pay for Firefox ourselves.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I will happily donate.
If, of course, money won't go to the CEO.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it is lol, have you seen how much the ceo is paying herself?

its kind of a reddit situaton, where money wouldnt be that much of an issue if it werent all for the ceo.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The title should be "Google pulls plug out of Chromium"

Too bad that even when people start switching, people writing drafts for the W3 spec are mostly Google employees. I'm sure that'll be their next battleground.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me that Microsoft and Google have been intensely "collaborating" with code for Linux kernel as well... Too good to be true good-hearted actions from those corporations...

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Don't forget stupid DRM bullshit.

https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-encrypted-media-2-20240718/

Editors:
    Joey Parrish (Google Inc.) 
    Greg Freedman (Netflix Inc.) 
Former editors:
    Mark Watson (Netflix Inc.) (Until September 2019) 
    David Dorwin (Google Inc.) (Until September 2017) 
    Jerry Smith (Microsoft Corporation) (Until September 2017) 
    Adrian Bateman (Microsoft Corporation) (Until May 2014) 

This was after Google bought WideVine in 2010.

[–] TaintPuncher@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It’s not perfect but PiHole will still catch a lot of the ads if you have the know-how to set one up. Tis a relatively cheap and easy solution that has the benefit of being able to block ads network-wide, providing your router lets you set a custom DNS.

https://pi-hole.net

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if my Internet provider forced me to use their router I'd plug my own router in behind that one fuck that.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (17 children)

Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.

But I’m with you on that, I don’t trust the isp’s backdoored router-modem. Hard pass.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

Its a good thing I've been using Firefox for almost 2 decades then.

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Screw you Google. Enjoy your antitrust.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

Bust this trust.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

If it keeps going on like this, it won't be long before I'll just say fuck it and switch to elinks...

Hmm, on that note - is there any CLI web browser that can do javascript and css? Because iirc, elinks doesn't, though I havent used it in years.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Elinks for can do basic CSS & JS. I wish there were better support for like 256 or 16 color modes for CSS to better support TUIs. The reading UX is generally pretty good, but stuff like syntax highlighting really helps. …That is if website makers did their job correctly & treated JavaScript as an enhancement. The bigger issue is even in the case of limited JS support like Netsurf, most developers aren’t going to be writing ES3 or ES5-compatible code which is about all most of these systems can support which means the JS will be broken anyhow without keeping their engines up to date.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago

Honestly, I blame developers who, some years ago, decided it was a good idea to centralize the browsers into the same engine. Yeah, it was hellish to maintain code for all browsers at the time (IE5, IE6, Firefox, Safari, etc), but it was paradise compared to our current scenario: at least we really had options: WebKit, Trident, Gecko, as well as lots of smaller, almost unknown engines. Now, all modern browsers are different wrappings of Chromium or Firefox, while most modern sites are developed without the active worry to keep Firefox compatible (one can notice how modern HTML5 features varies across both of them). It has no easy solution. Don't update, maybe? (Until sites start to complain about the outdated version)

load more comments
view more: next ›