My second and third internal drive are mounted to /home/username/datagrave and /home/username/backup .
I see no reason why I shouldn't do it this way.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
74 points (97.4% liked)
Linux
48371 readers
1621 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
load more comments
(4 replies)
In the past I've tended towards /srv/* as most mounts end up being application specific storage.
Though now it is all mounted as container volume storage.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I think tooling only cares for partitions. So /home and / are usually runtime-critical (can be on different disks or network storage), while internal data disks count as removable, since you can unmount their partitions.
My simple brain can't understand it bro. 🥲
That depends on your usecase.
I have setup servers where I mounted extra drives on /srv/nfs
When/If I switch to Linux I will probably mount my secondary drives to folders like
/home/stoy/videos
/home/stoy/music
/home/stoy/photos
/home/stoy/documents
/home/stoy/games
The ~/games will probably be an LVM since it contains little critical data and may absolutely need to be expanded to span several drives, though I would also be able to reduce the size of it and remove a drive from the LVM if needed.
I'd make a simple conky config to keep track of the drive space used
I'd just keep using the default automount spot for automounting drives.
load more comments
(1 replies)
/mnt is for anything and everything. /media doesn't even exist on Arch based distros and maybe others.
My Files, which are inside the partition mounted in /mnt/something has root as Owner. So When I try to move something to Trash, it's not allowing me to do, Only perma delete. When saw properties it said owner is root.
Is it because mounted at /mnt?
Files under /media seems fine. and says it's owner is 'me'
IDK if I'm doing anything wrong.
load more comments
(2 replies)
/mnt is not for everything, it is a temporary mount point. For fixed drives that are constantly mounted you should use another location (that could be anywhere in the filesystem tree).
load more comments
(2 replies)