this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19335 readers
455 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://radiation.party/post/41704

[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dafungusamongus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Copyright laws desperately need to be updated to account for scenarios like these. Although, to many people piracy is undesirable, I take no issue with anyone using this method to acquire content that is otherwise unavailable.

[–] Hogger85b@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. A lot of streaming services recently have been taking shows and films off the service and burry them as a tax write off. In my world if they write it off they should have to put it in public domain. If they can still sue people who copy it then it obviously has value to the rights owner still.

[–] hansl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The regulatory and legal system is mostly reactionary. Eventually someone will be sued or sue one of the services about it and it will be settled and become precedent. Which way is hard to say, but I can definitely see your argument being persuasive.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why I say, with not a single drop of irony, that piracy is a public service.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Piracy isn't piracy when it's no longer sold.