this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024

648 points (92.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers

175 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

648

Billy, yes!! (programming.dev)

submitted 5 months ago by federino@programming.dev to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 453 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The only mistake Billy made is giving anything to AdBlock Plus, the people who have sided WITH the ads, instead of uBlock Origin, the true MVPs of the ad blocking world. I guess uBlock doesn't accept donations unfortunately, but still, ABP is shady and I would not support them.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some of the block list maintainer do accept donations, if I recall.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 58 points 5 months ago

I did a quick search and they don't make it easy. Peter Lowe's ad and tracking server blocklist is the only one I found. EasyList doesn't seem to have a donation link, nor Dan Pollock at someonewhocares.org. Also worth noting that UBO doesn't take donations. You could always subscribe to AdGuard, but that's mixed.

[+] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 153 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] riddlemeboner@lemdro.id 186 points 5 months ago (1 children)

uBlock Origin*

[+] sleepybisexual@beehaw.org -59 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Same thing

Ublock is jdut shorter

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.run 136 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It very much is not the same thing

[–] sleepybisexual@beehaw.org 49 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, my bad

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's cool, you're sleepy. We get it

[–] sleepybisexual@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

Okie :3

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 61 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They aren’t. From a comment on https://www.reddit.com/r/ublock/comments/32mos6/ublock_vs_ublock_origin/ by u/tehdang:

For people who have stumbled into this thread while googling "ublock vs origin". Take a look at this link:

http://tuxdiary.com/2015/06/14/ublock-origin/

"Chris AlJoudi [current owner of uBlock] is under fire on Reddit due to several actions in recent past:

In a Wikipedia edit for uBlock, Chris removed all credits to Raymond [Hill, original author and owner of uBlock Origin] and added his name without any mention of the original author’s contribution.

Chris pledged a donation with overblown details on expenses like $25 per week for web hosting.

The activities of Chris since he took over the project are more business and advertisement oriented than development driven."

So I would recommend that you go with uBlock Origin and not uBlock. I hope this helps!

Edit: Also got this bit of information from here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/32ory7/ublock_is_back_under_a_new_name/

TL;DR:

gorhill [Raymond Hill] got tired of dozens of "my facebook isnt working plz help" issues.

he handed the repository to chrismatic [Chris Aljioudi] while maintaining control of the extension in the Chrome webstore (by forking chrismatic's version back to himself).

chrismatic promptly added donate buttons and a "made with love by Chris" note.

gorhill took exception to this and asked chrismatic to change the name so people didn't confuse uBlock (the original, now called uBlock Origin) and uBlock (chrismatic's version).

Google took down gorhill's extension. Apparently this was because of the naming issue (since technically chrismatic has control of the repo).

gorhill renamed and rebranded his version of ublock to uBlock Origin.

[–] IDew@lemm.ee 19 points 5 months ago

Some people are so greedy smh

I just love how Raymond thinks about donations. "Money is not my motivation." And forwards to the people that contribute the most by provoding filter lists for everyone!

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 119 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Ad block is NOT piracy. And use Ublock Origin.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 24 points 5 months ago

uBlock Origin is also not piracy, but it is the real way to block

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 22 points 5 months ago

Technically we are just keeping the waters clean of unusable, useless garbage. The ad corps are invading our waters.

[–] sleepybisexual@beehaw.org 89 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I prefer unlock origin but he got the spirit

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 40 points 5 months ago

Yeah, if your going to support something support the open source project that doesnt advertise

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If you buy premium, do it to support the creators you watch, fuck doing it just for no ads.

[+] Mr_Wobble@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago

Yeah just cutout the middle man and support creators directly

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I lack the money to buy something from every creator I watch (literally over 100 channels subbed to), and premium genuinely does pay them more than ads. Sure, like half is going to google, but it's definitely the easier way to support the creators that does actually pay them.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nebula might be the answer for you. A low annual fee means every video you watch gives a portion of that fee to the artist.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

The majority of the people i subscribe to aren't on Nebula, so that wont help a whole lot.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Why not?

If i am going to be supporting creators I think YT premium would be the way I would do it.

YouTube Premium is super helpful in distributing money automatically to creators without needing to think about it.

I have many many creators I tune in and out of I am not going to be trying to manage all of their patreons and trying to manage all of that.

Honestly I have to much crap already, 99% of merch is just garbage IMO that i will never use and don't need.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you buy premium your doing both.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Yes, but if I was only doing it for no ads, I'd rather just use ad block. Instead, I'm doing to to support the creators I watch in the laziest way possible, because I'm letting Google do all the work to spread the money out.

[–] Drewski@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SmartTube (for Android TV) accepts donations.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 4 points 5 months ago

And it runs great! Only solution for YT on TV.

[–] Titou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

ADP betrayed us, ublock origin is better

[–] normonator@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago

Abp is complete garbage. Use Ublock origin.

[–] Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Should support uBlock Origin and AdGuard, the maintainers of EasyList too

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

uBO doesn't accept donations and AdGuard is a commercial entity that was more than enough money.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 4 points 4 months ago

PeerTube go!