this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
427 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
3063 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
427
Name & shame. :) (mander.xyz)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How did this make it past review? I guess case reports might not have a peer review process

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

the entire paragraph after the highlight is still AI too

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Raneem Bader, Ashraf Imam, Mohammad Alnees, Neta Adler, Joanthan ilia, Diaa Zugayar, Arbell Dan, Abed Khalaileh. You are all accused of using chatgpt or whatever else to write your paper. How do you plead?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How do you feel about using chatgpt as a translation tool?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Depends on what kind of translation we're talking here. Translating some chatter? Translating a web page (most of these suck)? Translating a book for it to be published? Translating a book so you can read it yourself? Translating a scientific paper so you can publish it, without proofreading the translation?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is it the personal vs. private vs. public use that is bothersome or is it just the fact that these fuckers didn't proofread I guess is what I'm trying to figure out

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

They didn't proofread, plus there's a real chance that some other parts of the paper might be AI nonsense. If something so glaringly problematic got past, what smaller mistakes are also there? They effectively poisoned their own paper

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website -1 points 6 months ago

My money is on non-existent. I bet one of those dudes is real, at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] liss_up@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is astounding to me that this happened. A complete failure of peer review, of the editors, and OF COURSE of the authors. Just absolutely bonkers that this made it to publication. Completely clown shoes.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It keeps happening across all fields. I think we are about to witness a complete overhaul of the publishing model.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've been saying it to everyone who'll listen ...

the journals should be run by universities as non-profits with close ties to the local research community (ie, editors from local faculty and as much of the staff from the student/PhD/Postdoc body as possible). It's really an obvious idea. In legal research, there's a long tradition of having students run journals (Barrack Obama, if you recall, was editor of the Harvard Law Journal ... that was as a student). I personally did it too ... it's a great experience for a student to see how the sausage is made.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My field's too small to have separate journals for each university, but we do have one in the Free Journal Network that's run by the community

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

You don’t need one in each University, that wouldn’t scale. There’s be natural specialisations. And journals could even move from University to university as academic personnel change over time.

The main point is that they’re non-profit and run by researchers for researchers.

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

"but for specific cases, it is essential to consult a medical professional"

Foolish robot! I am the medical professional!

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Ah... welp, tis the AI era, I guess...

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you want a pediatric hepatobiliary surgeon? A four month old is going to be a tricky case, I'd think.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

the chatbot couldn't even recommend the right specialist 😑

[–] maculata@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Probs recommend a ‘Paedophile Hobgoblin’.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›