this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
149 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10671 readers
3310 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It would technically be the fifth law.

Zeroth Law - A robot may not injure humanity or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But if you're starting from zeroth it would be the fourth.

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

and with robots and computers it just makes sense to start with 0

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It’s even better because

Tap for spoilerA robot created the zeroth law to allow the killing of people to save humanity

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Only in the shitty movie. Not in the books.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Was there a movie? Mind you it’s been like 15 years since I read robots and empire but

Tap for spoilerAllowing the earth to be radiation poisoned would kill people but force the humans off earth

Like I’d love some good robots movies. Robots of Dawn would likely struggle with reception, and honestly so would Under the Naked Sun but Caves of Steel? Less so.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is the plot of the Will Smith version of I, Robot.

If I remember correctly, it's actually Daneel who comes up with the zeroth law. And it's not to justify killing people.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Daneel_Olivaw

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone put will smith in this movie, or call it I, Robot, much less I have to assume they combined robots and empire with caves of steel and that’s a shit decision as well‽

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They actually took a bunch of elements of the short story collection and jammed them together. The worst is what they did to Susan Calvin...

Ignoring the butchery, it's a pretty generic action movie. Very forgettable. Adding what they did to the source material makes it a straight tragedy.

[–] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

May not injure you say. Can't be injured if you're dead. (P.S. I'm not a robot)

[–] prex@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Sounds like something a robot would say.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure death qualifies as "harm".

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

couldn't that be inferred from the first law?

[–] Mithre@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Actually no! Lower numbered laws have priority over higher numbers, meaning that if they come into conflict the higher number law can be broken. While the first law says they can't allow humans to come to harm, the zeroth law basically says that if it's for the good of the species, they absolutely can kill or otherwise hurt individual humans.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This just reminds me I'm mildly irritated that robots in fiction have glowing eyes so often. Light is supposed to go into eyes, not come out of them!

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They addressed this on the Orville. The glowing dots were not eyes. The droid had sensors that did all the work. The "eyes" were an aesthetic addition.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"The last thing you need is more desert"

"Excuse me?!"

"As I cannot stutter, I must conclude that you heard me"

Isaac is one of the best parts of that show lmao

[–] wieson@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Robots or any part of an automated production line with a camera typically has a light as well to either see in low light conditions or to ensure it always sees with a similar amount of light hitting the lense.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Also, a lot of the machine vision systems I've run up against use red light, but it is kind of complex. If they want to detect say blood, I think blue light would actually give better contrast for detection.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 4 months ago

I really like the design of Assaultron from Fallout 4, they didn't have such issue because their eye is placed just above the glowy part, and the glowy part is the head laser that will one shot you.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

So long as the light isn't coming from BEHIND the lense then you can think of it being like a camera flash

Or just think of it as the power indication LED being made stylish

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago
self.setEyeColor(self.isGood() ? 'blue' : 'red');
[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

I'm all for it. Makes them easier see. FOR SUPER EEEAAARRRTTTHHH

[–] tulliandar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If they’re evil it presumably means they’re disobeying the first three laws… they may disobey the fourth law too to help cover their other crimes

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Come on, you can trust me. You're thinking of the old red light Agimus. Blue light Agimus wants to help!"

[–] Belzebubulubu@mujico.org 1 points 4 months ago

I think it's supposed to represent errors in the robots code like "I'm evil cuz i'm bugged"