this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024

0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23153 readers

2763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

Teacher who resigned after her OnlyFans page was discovered says new employer fired her for violating social media policy (slatereport.com)

submitted 7 months ago by captainred@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The important piece of this to me is this: She made $1 mil on OnlyFans and $42k/year as a teacher. She wants to be a teacher despite making plenty of money from other sources. This tells me that unless you have other evidence of impropriety she's someone we want in the classroom. It also reinforces my stance, along with plenty of other studies that have been performed, that a universal basic income won't stop people from working.

Pay people better and we'll just keep working because we like it. It's part of being human, but we shouldn't be suffering to survive at the same time.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I quit a job I really liked for one I didn't like nearly as much because I hardly made more than minimum wage

If I won the lottery I would go back to that first job and work for free.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't retire on $1m net worth. That's not even a house in lots of areas.

It definitely helps. But giving up my career for $1m would be a very bad investment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sort of the joke in it all. You can't retire on $42k/year either

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

yea but you can teach all life long, whereas on Onlyfans you... uh,... nevermind

y'all misunderstood my post, I think. I was trying to joke about the fact that even if you're getting on in years, there will always be an audience for your OnlyFans. Anywayyyy

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

yea but you can teach all life long

Dying on your feet in class, because you can never afford to retire

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$1 million = 23.8 years of teaching at $42K/yr.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Add in that id you don't blow it all, you get to count the interest income. A long term investment gets about 6-7% per year. That's actually more than the teaching job pay.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

A long term investment gets about 6-7% per year.

Much better than that in the current market

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love how the employer admitted to not checking her references or googling her beforehand.

Can't really blame her when they didn't do their due diligence.

[–] SpraynardKruger@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the ones who hired a teacher without doing any sort of a background check are the ones who really should be fired. Imagine if they hired someone who was actually dangerous to their students.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

oops I dropped these

https://www.wsj.com/articles/yes-students-do-learn-more-from-attractive-teachers-1472223974

https://www.psypost.org/students-are-more-willing-to-do-homework-when-they-view-their-teacher-as-attractive/

how clumsy of me, sorry y'all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The attractive teachers must have really been frustrated by me. I only cared if you were a cool teacher. Most of the time, the attractive teachers were not the cool teachers.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My favorite and best teacher was a 70 year old retired Catholic nun who was a big fan of rulers on knuckles. But my God was she a fantastic teacher.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

...And was she hot?

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

GILF to her knees.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Man ugly people truly are fucked in every sense.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For sure it's different when kids would just find out and start downloading her naked photos. Then parents would find out and be insanely mad that kids are viewing their teacher's naked photos. It's different case than secretly fantasizing about your pretty teacher lol

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago

I know how the parents feel. That's stupid article didn't include a link. Journalistic malpractice is what it is

[–] TangoUndertow@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It feels like she knew she would get fired from this new job, leverage it nationwide articles and get even more subscribers to her OF page. She even references the teaching gig in her bio, and the new job in her latest posts.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe. It doesn't matter. Jobs shouldn't be able to fire you because you get naked on the Internet, which requires you to pay to even see in the first place.

Edit:

@meep_launcher@lemm.ee made a great point about teacher/student dynamics and I can agree with that in most circumstances (e.g. the students are underage). I still think it's ridiculous for her second, non-teaching job to fire her.

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm a teacher and they specifically have guidelines on what you're behavior online should be. Keeping your socials clean. Making sure my interactions with students are kept professional.

The fact is that kids these days are nosey and great researchers. Having an only fans as an educator has a huge risk of students discovering it, and will ultimately change the relationship between student and teacher from a student/ teacher relationship to a viewer/ pornstar one.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the most sane, rational summation of this debacle I've read yet.

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

This thread seems to fall into the "people who have no idea about the realities of teaching being confidently incorrect".

As someone somewhere said; if you want to lose faith in comment sections, go to a discussion on a topic that you are an expert on.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OnlyFans and high school teacher absolutely do not mix. There is a 0% chance one will be able to properly educate students in that environment.

[–] FloMo@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If only we paid them a living wage so they wouldn’t have to seek additional income to survive.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If only we paid them a living wage

ST. LOUIS...Her yearly teaching salary was $42,000

In 2016, the median household income in the City of St. Louis was $42,000. source (expand the dropdown: What does this indicator measure')

She made as much teaching as the median household income in the area by herself (completely ignoring the rest of her household). Since when is that not a living wage?

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If there was karma on this place then I'm about to yeet it into oblivion but nevertheless. Teachers are not paid nearly enough but doing only fans and teaching to not combine at all. I won't bother explaining why because it's obvious.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

doing only fans and teaching to not combine at all

Then we'll see fewer and fewer teachers. And more and more sex workers.