this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23236 readers
3325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Both the president and his reelection campaign are going after his coup-attempting predecessor even before the first GOP primary ballots are cast.

A full year out from the 2024 presidential election and nearly two months before Republicans cast their first primary ballots, President Joe Biden and his campaign are assuming that Donald Trump will be his opponent and have already started reminding voters why they threw him out of office in the first place.

Biden personally has stepped up criticism of his coup-attempting predecessor and is framing the likely rematch as one that will determine the survival of American democracy.

“The same man who said we should terminate the rules and regulations and articles of the Constitution — these are things he said — is now running on a plan to end democracy as we know it,” he said last week at a fundraiser in Chicago.

“This next election is different. It’s more important. There’s more at stake. And we all know why: Because our very democracy is at stake,” he told a San Francisco audience on Wednesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

I voted for Biden because I wanted to stop fascism and world war, now Israel is doing genocide and bombing its neighbors with Biden's tacit support.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (26 children)

And we must hold Biden responsible.

But are you suggesting that Trump would approach Israel any differently? The US response is deeply rooted in morally evil international interests, I don’t think any president could respond much differently without severe internal consequences to themselves. It would be the right thing to do, though it would be political suicide thanks to said evil interests.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And we must hold Biden responsible.

I think in place of this, you mean Biden should be held accountable, but you have no intention or expectation of it actually happening. Reelection is definitely the opposite of that. And like Bush transitioning to Obama, I doubt you'll be calling for any retroactive accountability once Biden has left office after reelection.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then your assumptions are incorrect.

I would prefer not to re-elect Biden. I however am not in control of the Democratic Party, and so the best I can do is vote in elections leading up to the national election. When the day comes next year for a national election, it will be Biden VS. Whomever the republicans pick. Those are my two choices, whether I like it or not.

I am already politically active in demanding Biden be held accountable. I am still active in demanding Bush be held accountable for war crimes. I will still remain active in the future to ensure Biden answers for them as well.

As a law abiding citizen, I am protesting and voting. So do you suggest I commit violence instead? That is the only next step, seeing as I am not in control of who the Democrat party elects.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

that sounds about what my assumptions were. A desire for accountability, yet you'll be voting for him and he won't be facing any sort of accountability.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m trying to conduct some conversation here. You haven’t responded to my inquires and fail to show any motivation beyond disparaging the US. If you’d like to actually care and be a part of the solution, I’ll be waiting over here.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The barest minimum for holding a politician accountable is not reelecting them.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

History suggests the exact opposite.

Consider healthcare and Obamacare. What happened when people unhappy with Obamacare not going far enough didn't vote in 2010? The US swung rightward and the far right grew in power. The only thing that happened with healthcare was the constant Republican attempts to repeal it, and they were almost successful. We almost saw regression on the issue, not improvement.

Think about this another way -- if reelection is a vindication to the politics and means their voters see no need to hold them accountable, what happens if a Republican wins? They'll see their positions as justified and be emboldened. The country will seem to favor conservatism, so Democrats will go the opposite direction and become more moderate. A Republican victory isn't seen as Democrats needing to be more left and a Democrat victory isn't seen as Republicans being to be more right. It's the complete opposite.

The problem is that you're forgetting this is a zero sum game. If you hold the Democrat accountable, you let the Republican slide. If you hold the Republican accountable, you let the Democrat slide. If you want to hold both accountable and just not vote, you're letting the candidate at an advantage slide and holding the underdog accountable. There's no good option. If you want to actually hold both of them accountable, you have to vote FOR the one that's closer the direction you want to go, and then use your vote as leverage. Politicians listen a lot more to their voters than go non voters. Young people are putting real pressure on Biden because they previously voted for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Biden is president of the US, not the world. He has little more ability to stop the latest flare up of that decades long conflict than does Trudeau or any other nation’s leader.

What do you expect him to do about it that he isn’t already doing?

e: more to the point, what do you think Trump would do that would have any real effect?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)

Suuuure, buddy. Because the alternative would be SO much better. Have you forgotten the many, many times Trump explicity showed support for Netanhayu?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

They don't actually want Trump behind bars.

They want to hang a possible second Trump Presidency over us like the sword of Damocles.

This way every future election is "the most important election in US history."

This way they can always do bare minimum and still be "better" than the Republicans offering hate and authoritarianism.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Think Trump would have had a better response?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MisterHavoc@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Would it be any different if it was any other president? Put differently, is it Biden supporting genocide, or America?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

Most Americans support a ceasefire, so it's not really "America" either. It's the ruling class.

But Biden has a lot of power all on his own. We can't ignore that.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

Don't forget that Democrats for the most part have to listen to their voters or risk their jobs. Republicans don't have to listen to anyone because Republican voters would literally vote for Hitler if he had an R next to his name. There's been a slow trickle of headlines about Biden changing his tune on Israel as slow as a geriatric can go because of the immense outrage.

load more comments
view more: next ›