this post was submitted on 03 May 2024

44 points (97.8% liked)

Firefox

21258 readers

111 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

Why is Firefox mobile's PDF view so bad, while Desktop's is perfectly fine? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On Mobile (using Mull) the PDFs are completely pixelated and simply dont render more details. Even after zooming in it takes forever.

Meanwhile on Desktop (Librewolf, Firefox, ... on Fedora) it seems a bit slow compared to Okular, but it is very fine.

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Cochise@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 2 years ago

And PDF on mobile is so slow....

[+] neme@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Good hint!

In about:config:

javascript.options.baselinejit true

Still the same, my used PDF

It is likely really the issue that it doesnt render until the whole document is downloaded. This needs to change or at least have a setting.

So I turned JIT off again.

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just tried opening the link in Mull and it is amazingly fast. It takes only 1 sec to render after zooming in or scrolling a lot at once. I'm a bit surprised because the file is 300+ pages. But I do encounter slow PDF loading sometimes, then I download the file and open it in another app

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Strange...

I have NoScript and UBlockOrigin installed, disabling both didnt change anything.

Disabling both and enabling JIT didnt change anything. Maybe it is a GrapheneOS issue?

[–] rambos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I dont know, I have ublock, but not using the rest

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use the Android PDF.js extension and PDFs work great for me.

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

for some reason i'm not able to download it, is there aything im supposed to do other than click the unclickable download button?

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does the webpage say anything about the extension being unavailable or something? I don't know if stable Firefox has that one enabled. I use Nightly which had allowed all extensions for a long time and idk about Stable

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

could be that, but all i see is the page with the big blue download button (which is slightly grayed out and not working) so idk. anyway, i found in this posts thread a good pdf reader so i wont need the browser extension, thanks though

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use MJ PDF on Android, and it's very responsive, and foss: https://github.com/mudlej/mj_pdf/

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes same but that just uses the Chromium Webview. It is the best viewer but not for stuff you dont download.

https://mupdf.com/ is another one if you want somethinf standalone.

[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

muPDF viewer is great. It only shows the contents of the PDF file and nothing else.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Just tried it, works very well and fast but I think I prefer MJ PDF also because it runs on hardened Chromium so less RAM etc.

Also MJ PDF has a dark mode, inverting black/white on texts