this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
548 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2334 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president made multiple chilling warnings during an interview with Time magazine.

Donald Trump hasn’t quite let go of the possibility of utilizing mob violence if he loses the next election.

In a sprawling interview for Time magazine, Trump hinted that leveraging political violence to achieve his end goals was still on the table.

“If we don’t win, you know, it depends,” he told Time. “It always depends on the fairness of the election.”

And from Trump’s perspective, that’s winning rhetoric. According to him, his incendiary comments supporting a mob mentality, his early warnings of forthcoming abuses of power, and his threats to be a dictator on “day one” are only inching him closer to the White House. “I think a lot of people like it,” Trump told Time.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm more afraid what will happen if he wins, because I don't know anything about that. I'd expect a Jan 6 2.0 if he loses, but I don't know if there will be either Kristalnacht 2.0, Nazi book burnings 2.0, or just slow erosion of secular human rights in favor of christian fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Another Jan. 6? Like the chaos that is currently unfolding from the baker's dozen of MAGA protestors outside the courthouse?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

If he tries it might cost him more than money

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm not worried about it if he loses. He's just some guy. If people start to get violent on his behalf, they get arrested.

The scary part is if he wins in 2024 and has another Jan 6th (and the related effort to stay in power) after his term should have ended.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Writers are running out of ideas for this season of jackass

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey, maybe we could put Trump in a shopping cart and roll him off the roof of an abandoned casino!

load more comments (1 replies)

It’s pretty clear that his endgame is to basically cause an enormous bloodbath.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Well maybe he should tell his supporters not to do that again….

[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

This time we'll be ready for his sorry ass.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 10 points 7 months ago

You misspelled “threatened”.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Bring it on, motherfuckers.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

And it could go the same as last time.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

At least if he does lose, there will hopefully be a riot squad waiting at the capital in case his threat comes true. It's what I'd do just in case he loses. In fact, it'd be the first thing I do! At the very least, if they don't come immediately within the first week after the election, just have them on standby just in case they eventually show up, ready to perform treason.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

If you didn't already know this would be the case, you're too optimistic about the situation.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›