this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
30 points (85.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21019 readers
299 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 33 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Yes. It is bloated. But not for the reasons you may think.

    Live OSes need to fit multiple requirements compared to the installed ones. They need to:

    • Install the OS without internet
    • Provide a test ground for the OS
    • Be a way to repair damaged OS

    So of course it's bloated, but in a good way. You may be already familiar with Ubuntu, and not care about the live OS part, so it would be bloat for you. You may not care about setting up disks, so GParted is bloat for you, etc...

    If you want a less bloated installer, some other distros like debian give net installers

    [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    EndeavourOS iso also does the same thing but with half the size.

    [–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

    Half the tool chains

    [–] electro1@infosec.pub 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's not how you download ISOs.. 😐..

    👉 Qbittorent

    [–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

    Enjoy the faster downloads.

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:2aa4f5a7e209e54b32803d43670971c4c8caaa05&dn=ubuntu-24.04-desktop-amd64.iso&tr=https%3a%2f%2ftorrent.ubuntu.com%2fannounce&tr=https%3a%2f%2fipv6.torrent.ubuntu.com%2fannounce

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
    [–] electro1@infosec.pub 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Your Internet is flying.. Oh my gosh... just noticed.. I could only dream of seeing such speeds with my ISP...

    anyways, even if it was a 500Mb ISO, using Qbit is much faster and you help others too..

    [–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    What is truly bloated is their network-install images, starting with a 14MB kernel and 65MB initrd, which then proceeds to pull a 2.5GB image which they unpack into RAM to run the install.

    This is especially egregious when running thin VMs for lots of things, since you now require them to have at least 4GB of RAM simply to be able to launch the installer at all.

    Compare this to regular Debian, which uses an 8MB kernel and a 40MB initrd for the entire installer.
    Or some larger like AlmaLinux, which has a 13MB kernel and a 98MB initrd, and which also pulls a 900MB image for the installer. (Which does mean a 2GB RAM minimum, but is still almost a third of the size of Ubuntu)

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Not to mention pulling a 2.5GB image is kind of hard on network. I don't get it as that costs them more money.

    [–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 1 points 5 months ago

    We're mirroring the images internally, not just because their mirrors suck and would almost double the total install time when using them, but also because they only host the images for the very latest patch version - and they've multiple times made major version changes which have broken the installer between patches in 22.04 alone.

    [–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    Live CD? More like live blu ray

    [–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

    CDs were 700MB

    [–] dabu@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Seriously what's in there? Last ISO I've used with size like this came with 6 different DEs. Ubuntu ships only Gnome IIRC

    [–] bleistift2@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    Every driver you could possibly need for any hardware in the last 20 years? This is a live CD and is expected to just work no matter what you’re running it on.

    Edit: Also, of course, every program you might need to usefully test-drive a distro, like office apps, media players, image viewers, browser, email client, and a myriad more. Now that I’ve said it I find 6GB remarkably small.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
    [–] thanatotus@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Fedora also by default includes only free stuff. AFAIK Ubuntu includes non free codecs for media and other software that doesn't fit in FOSS category (it's also one of t the reasons why Ububtu became so popular in my opinion, it just works works out of the box)

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Fedora includes non free firmware as per there policy

    [–] killthefish@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

    doesn't include nvidia drivers, doesn't include codecs needed to play proprietary media.

    [–] mihnt@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    Ubuntu ships only Gnome IIRC

    ~~Unity is it's default.~~

    [–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

    Ubuntu switched back to GNOME as default six years ago

    [–] Moshpirit@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
    [–] bonfire921@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

    I hate you for this pun

    [–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

    You definitely haven't seen Bazzite yet

    [–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    If only there was some alternative distro without the bloat. Say, one link down from that one.

    [–] passepartout@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago
    [–] dopeshark@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

    Hopefully has some games bundled in

    [–] jaromil@fed.dyne.org 1 points 5 months ago

    try dynebolic.org 1.5GB live OS including many pre installed applications like kdenlive, audacity, ardour and OBS...

    [–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I bet a ton of it is Nvidia and AMD junk.

    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net -1 points 5 months ago

    Linux shipping all drivers by default is a problem

    [–] RacoonVegetable@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago

    ~~Donald trump~~ VanillaOS please save me from these people 🙏 🙌

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    <3 Debian network install image.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

    Or Linux Mint regular ISO. You know its bad when Linux mint has a comparatively small iso

    [–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi -1 points 5 months ago

    Is Ubuntu enshittifying?