this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
876 points (97.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29079 readers
215 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.world is temporarily disabling open signups and moving to an application-required signup process, due to ongoing issues with malicious bot accounts.

We know this is a major step to take, but we believe that it’s the right one for both us and our community right now.

We’re working on a better long-term technical solution to these bots, but that will take time to create, test, and verify that it doesn’t cause any problems with federation and how our users use our site, and we’d rather make sure we get it right than have a site that’s broken.

We’re making this change on 28 Aug 2023, and don’t have a specific timeline for how long registrations will require an application, but we will post an update once our new anti-abuse measures are in place and working.

Take care, LW Team

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I think it's the right call honestly. We've grown so quick that it must be hard to manage by now.

[–] 007v2@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Thanks for all the work you do! It isn’t unappreciated.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://github.com/bumble-tech/private-detector

Do you guys think this could help? I remembered reading bumble open sourced their image detection system.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

If you could give me the numbers of new accounts monthly I would look into CloudFlare. If I can afford it I will even pay for it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] figaro@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago

Sounds like something a bot would say! Off with his head!

[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good hope the child porn posting stops with that.

[–] Axisential@lemmy.nz 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh Christ, really? That's just sickening. I often sort by new, sounds like I've been very lucky to miss it entirely...

Yeah i had the unpleasant encounter several times by now...

[–] teruma@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will this make it easier to reopen federation with instances that were concerned about abuse of our open sign up policy? (or was the issue with beehaw resolved while I wasn't looking?)

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

If it's temporary, likely not. The concern from most of the instances is that open subs mean literally anyone and anything can join, including bots which create account after account, just moving on when the original is banned. "We are closing open signups for now" is non committal, I'm betting the only way things get refederated is if World commits to this change for the long term.

[–] NekoKamiGuru@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 year ago

As long as users from allied instances can still post it is all good.

[–] amenotef@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Beep Beep. Thank you for the update.

[–] funkmunki@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beep boop beep. Hello fellow human.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hi humans, wich way to the likely scam victems.

I will give them head patts and a free mini fridge.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I cannot be thankful, i have not been tamed

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy.world users were mostly upset 2 months ago about how other Lemmy servers had application based registration and that made it bad for widespread adoption.

Incidents like this are part of why this is a bad idea. Hopefully mitigations to maliciously posted illegal content can be implemented to help Lemmy server admins big and small.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

People make these applications seem like a much bigger deal than they are. You don't need to fill out an essay or anything, just a sentence or two to reassure the server owner that you're a normal person. I just mentioned the old Lemmy account I was moving away from. I get that it's a barrier for some though.

[–] nantsuu@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this mean Beehaw will refederate?

Considering the people that run Beehaw and their very fast defederation, I can't imagine that their statement of wanting to refederate is anything other than a mere pleasantry. I doubt they really want to.

And its fine, small communities are easier to manage. Its not like we are really missing out on much.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago
[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess I'm out of the loop, perhaps because I mostly browse communities I subscribed to, but...

What happened? Lots of spammy bots signing up and spamming the site? I guess I didn't notice where I was looking

Also, what does application based sign up mean?

Anyhow, Lemmy.World and Lemmy (in general) are growing nicely, so what's needed to defend them is cool.

Edit: fixed grammar

[–] lwadmin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Update: we opened registrations again but temporary email addresses will still be banned.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

IMO registration applications should have been in use right from the start. Less annoyances for admins and moderators.

Not really, you have to manually approve all.

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't put the manual review of thousands of application into the "less annoyances" box.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agreed. Similar to waiting periods for weapons purchases. It would be an effective filter for most people who get in the mood of making a troll post, they would get tired of it before they are approved, and many users with hateful names would be disallowed before they can start posting their hate.

Example of hateful user@lgbtslayer@lemmy.world being the quintessential example that pushed Beehaw to defederate from LW, after that user posted anti-lgbt and misogynist stuff directly into Beehaw's lgbtq+ community

[–] Jok3r@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago
[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm actually advocating for something in between: having a open registration weekend on a set time every month, and registration applications the rest of the time.

It solves both problem of having too many applications to deal with, and makes it a lot harder to create spam accounts since the time surface is reduced significantly.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then bot creators would just.... Use the open signup window and regular users get the shaft.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's easier to monitor for suspicious bit signup activities when you funnel them into a small time window with full attention during that time frame, instead of having to watch for them 24/7.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can you explain? It's likely not a human validating hundreds of not thousands of signups anyway.