this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
326 points (98.2% liked)

Games

32654 readers
1171 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aremel@lemmy.world 100 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Triple I as in triple Indie? That's cute as hell, I love it. I'm all for III over AAA.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it took me a moment to get it, but then I was like "oh, neat! That's very clever"

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 82 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Successful indies helping out the indie industry is the only way it'll grow, a big award show that gets people's eyes is the kind of marketing most developers could only dream of. But they a really going to have to treat each nomination as a commercial, people need to be sold on these games

Assuming they don't just pick the devs that were already thinking of. If it's just that then it's probably pointless

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The only way it will grow? Man, the indie scene was pretty much non existent 20 years ago and now it rivals major studios in number of concurrent players

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Yeah, and it's pretty much hit a wall. Both because of massive oversaturation causing people to not be able to find new interesting things amongst the 100 new titles released daily, ans because indy studios can't find any funding at all anymore.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

Oh, it's always been around. Before the Internet even... It's always been there, hell as a kid I jailbroke my PSP and loaded it up homebrew games, some of them were quite good.

And before that, there were no AAA studios, there was only indie. Doom was made by an indie studio, Minecraft was indie, flash games were indie, even the original text mmorpgs played over arpanet were indie

They've always been there, often pushing the boundaries and trailblazing. It may not have been mainstream, but it's always been at the forefront of gaming, trying new things and trailblazing

Three things are different now - it's far easier to advertise and sell indie games, powerful tools are more available to the common person than ever, and modern gaming is getting worse by the day

Which is great, but also a double edged sword. Games (even fairly simple games) take a long time to make - like years if you do it consistently in your free time, or months going full time.

Early Access was great for this - you could put up the prototype, then raise the money and support to quit your job and hire an artist to flesh it out. But if everything is early access, nothing is.

Conversely, if you go into game dev communities (haven't found any great ones since I left that site), you hear all about people dropping $1500 for marketing that does nothing, because indie gamers tend to like indie style social media, and mainstream gamers you can easily pay to reach don't really like indie games

Skill with social media is key to a successful indie game, but there's not a lot of crossover between that and making a good game

So this kind of thing is huge - if piratesoftware recommends a game I'll at least look at it, because I respect his opinion on game design. If I see an ad, store page, or random clip of a game, I'm unlikely to look at it

Indie gaming doesn't need this because indie games are rare, it needs it because it's so difficult to find the hidden gems buried in mountains of mediocre games

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

I nominate Daniel Mullins for III god award!

[–] Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully this showcase is successful enough to become a tradition. It would be nice to have an indie-focused showcase that doesn't have to juggle their time between the games, advertisements, and sponsors.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At this point, it would be cool to have a gaming event at all that doesn't invite random Hollywood celebrities instead of actual game developers

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"OMG, those nerds have had 20 full seconds to talk? WRAP IT UP"

(for those who don't know Game Awards really did this. The few acceptance speeches that were there were very short, and winners were all told to "WRAP IT UP" via teleprompter and cut with music. 11 minutes of them talking in total, for a 3-hour-long show)

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago

Fuck yeah, cut the corpos out of the hobby space.

As a budding game developer, watching mobile games dominate all the game awards is so incredibly frustrating.

My first game award, I watched those Farmville motherfuckers take award after award, while amazing indie games are given lip service but not the trophy.

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

I don't know what's going on with this headline; it's not an awards show, just a showcase. Although I understand how events like The Game Awards blur the line between the two.

Makes me feel like Game News Season (or whatever we're calling it post-E3) is coming up quick.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Looking forward to it!

[–] DoctorButts@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 7 months ago

They shoulda been really cheeky and called it the quadruple-I game awards. Missed opportunity.

[–] foudinfo@jlai.lu 2 points 7 months ago

okay, that is awesome

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I'll watch it

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You love to see it.