this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
396 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

34988 readers
400 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between giving a monkey AIDS and trying to fix it and shoving some toy in its brain causing it to die a slow painful death.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the difference exactly? It's both animal testing. It's going to be cruel by its very nature. They're testing on animals because they're not allowed to test on humans. If they could they would.

Everyone here acting like this is all black and white. Without animal testing there's no modern medicine. That is a choise we could have made but didn't. Thousands of animals had to suffer so that millions of people would not. From an utilitairian point of view it's a no-brainer but it's still cruel as fuck and there's no getting around that. Animal testing or no - both leads to individuals suffering unecessarily.

I, for one aren't willing to take the moral high ground here, because I eat meat ie. take part in the chicken/pig holocaust.

I guess I'll take the floor as a vegetarian and say I agree, but that doesn't mean we can't triage the extent of animal trials. Was it really necessary to give monkeys implants? I don't really know how you'd test that system before putting it in people without testing it on animals first. Do we really need this kind of implant? Well, it's a BCI, which lots of teams around the world are working on, so Neuralink would never be the only ones doing trials. As AI get ever better, I think it's important that we have the ability to communicate with it better and maneuver more easily and naturally in cyberspace.