this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
151 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2726 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but that's what sanctions are. It's not really possible to have convenient sanctions. How would that work.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Sanctions are typically the acts of a government state not the actions of a business. Businesses have to comply with them but only if they’re bound by them. That wasn’t the case here. Lush did this based on public outcry, not sanctions.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And at the end of the day if that interpretation is true, your essentially saying 'bad fucking luck' to all the Russians who lost their jobs while living in a country perpetrating a war that if they speak out against, they'll be jailed at best.

You're right, there's no convenient sanctions but if that's really what old mate Lush is saying, he's got a point.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

i mean, this is one way to win a war. the other is with bombs and death. Russia chose to enter this war, it shouldn't be surprised when it affects its citizens.

no one should get to keep their war over seas and out of their own borders.

imagine a future where we could stop wars by just taking people's jobs...

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Well, killing people using economy seems more humane than killing people using bombs, so I have to agree

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes… I think that’s exactly what he’s saying.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uhhuh and I was showing my dislike of that. It's good you can follow the conversation.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Wow. You’re fun.