195
Valve engineer says Steam Machine performance beats 70% of PCs, and can play all games
(www.notebookcheck.net)
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
195 points (95.3% liked)
Hardware
4491 readers
83 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
- Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@lemmy.world
- Laptops - !laptops@lemmy.world
- Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
- Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
- Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
- Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
- Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
- Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People often aren't aware that the average PC gamer doesn't have a 5090. The majority of people are using pretty outdated hardware. And Steam are certainly in a position to know that because of the Steam survey.
Nvidia is not helping, either. What they're charging now is bonkers.
...Intel is trying at least. Battlemage is good, it's just inexplicably not selling well. I'd have jumped on it a heartbeat if they made a bigger card.
I think Intel's issue is that they're focusing on the low end. Anyone with a 3060 or better would see the b580 as a lateral move at best, or more likely a downgrade. A b770 card would probably have gotten me to upgrade as long as they weren't stingy with the ram.
They focus on the low end, but a lot of people who only want low end GPUs care about Minecraft, and their OpenGL performance is abysmal, so Minecraft runs like molasses. If you play a lot of Minecraft, Nvidia's cards manage to be much better value. There's no reason why this couldn't be fixed if they're willing to invest in writing native OpenGL drivers instead of going through a compatibility player or mitigated if they invested more in making the compatibility layer faster, but that would mean deciding they're losing a lot of sales this way, as it wouldn't be cheap.
...Yeah.
Ironically, they seemed to figure 'low end' is where the sales are at. Yet my guess is most 'low end' buyers pick Nvidia by default, and folks who are upgrading from anything aim higher than a B580.
I would've killed for a 512-bit Arc card (other than the unobtanium datacenter GPUs), but that's a fever dream for now...