this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
103 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38826 readers
2144 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ffs you could have just read the biblical account by now. First chapter of Luke and Matthew. I am done spoon-feeding and enabling your laziness

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I read those and it doesn't say she was raped.

I also did an internet search because you seem pretty useless, "was Mary raped in the Bible" and the only explanations I am seeing for that is that she was underage. This is what I asked about in the beginning of this comment chain.

I feel like if it was so clear and obvious Mary was raped in the Bible, it would be easier to find information on it!

But that's okay. It's already clear you're lying and that's why you keep trying to send me on a wild goose chase. I've seen it many times, and it happens pretty much without fail when pressing people like you for evidence to support their claims.

Here's a little Reddit thread that's very similar: https://old.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/xqzsoh/was_mary_raped_by_god/

Looks like everyone who says she was raped say it's only because she was underage. You're afraid to admit that's the only reason why because you are arguing in bad-faith (heh.)

[–] UnPassive@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dog, she was impregnated by the holy ghost without consent. I don't believe that actually happened, but that's what the bible says...

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Luke 1:38 ‘And Mary said, “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.”

This was mentioned as evidence that she consented. Do you have any evidence to suggest otherwise?

[–] UnPassive@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Seems like a bit of a power dynamic problem... one could argue Job consented to all his bad treatment by trusting in the lord. Abraham was gonna kill his son. But I'd wager if I asked them, as a stranger, there's no way any of them would consent. It's the threat of etarnal fire that inspires such devotion and sacrifice. Bit of an unhealthy relationship if you ask me... my Christian parents are happy to ruin their lives for a better afterlife - including eroding their relationships with their kids. Bit sad. If I did believe in a god, I wouldn't believe that he sent us here to make us suffer and make sacrifices.

But you are correct, the gospel I was looking at didn't mention Mary giving consent. Just one of the problems of having 4 conflicting accounts...