this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
144 points (98.6% liked)

General Discussion

13737 readers
48 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What do you think?

I think in the face of AI taking over many tasks, we need to rethink about how we frame the future of society. Reframing Universal Basic Income as Automation Compensation means presenting the policy as a way to make up for jobs and income lost due to automation and AI. Instead of viewing UBI as a general welfare payment, it becomes seen as compensation paid to everyone for the value automation creates, supporting those whose work is replaced by machines and helping everyone share in productivity gains. Especially in the US, the average person doesn't like the idea of someone getting something that they're personally not receiving. So framing it as a compensation that everyone receives regardless of employment status I think is the only feasible way forward.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is reframing it back to square 1? It's not like we're resetting the idea. The idea of "compensation" is showing the aspect of UBI that makes sense to someone who doesn't like the idea of "free income".

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reframing it would be like keeping the name but changing the messaging around it. Like call it ubi but say its being done for equality and streamlining of welfare.

Renaming it to automation compensation means you now how to explain/argue/advertise it from scratch. It could work but i think its to much effort.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I get your point, but I don't think it would be from scratch, more like building upon it from an angle that a lot of individualistic people would more likely listen to. Compensation is a strong word for something deserved, that we're all effected indirectly from automation, every job that we could have had that a robotic arm is doing has reduced our ability to earn.