this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
529 points (97.7% liked)

RPGMemes

14231 readers
1073 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

...you’re writing in properties for the mimic that aren’t in the rules...

The rules don't say goblins breathe, either. If you can't extrapolate that living creatures breathe, you're not doing a good job.

...to explain the mimic both breathing and being imperceptible

I'm quite clearly doing the opposite, though. As does the lore attached to it, which clearly says "a mimic in its altered form is nearly unrecognizable". Nearly unrecognizable means it is recognizable.

...some form of motionless skin breathing.

Okay, now you're the one writing in properties that aren't in the rules. Especially since its skin can be just wood.

...its your model that is wrong, not the rules.

No, neither are wrong. You just misunderstood the rules. And my model. The rules say they are indistinguishable when motionless. I say they aren't motionless. No contradiction.

[–] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

which clearly says "a mimic in its altered form is nearly unrecognizable"

Where does this "nearly" come from? Because my Monster Manual doesn't have that word in the mimic description...

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I copy-pasted from the 2014 entry.

[–] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm going ahead and hit "doubt" on that statement as I looked at my 2014 Monster Manual before writing my previous message and the word "nearly" is absent in that description.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what to tell you. I went to 5etools, looked at the 2014 lore, and directly copy-pasted that exact quote. You can check yourself. If I wrote it, I'd have spelt unrecognisable with an s instead of a z. Maybe it got errata'd at some point?

[–] ganryuu@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok, so I'm sorry about my previous tone, it seems that the mimic article, on 5etools and the SRD website, is the source of our confusion and disagreement: each time the description appears twice, first without the word "nearly" (under "False Appearance") then once with it. That 2nd description, under "Imitative Predators", does not appear in the Monster Manual. I could not check what D&D Beyond says because I do not have access to its contents.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I think 5e tools uses the first ever printed version, while WotC reprint and edit the lore in the Monster Manual a LOT. D&D Beyond would probably be a third entry entirely. I'm glad we're on the same page now (or rather, we were on the same page, but the books were different).

[–] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't the mimics just hold their breath for a long time? I also see no problem with them having a physiology so different that their body literally doesn't move when they breathe, but I don't play D&D, so maybe I'm missing something with that.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

In Dark Souls, mimics breathe slowly. Like, 17 seconds per breath. It's tough to spot, but you can spot it if you're cautious. Since it's proven to catch people off guard, but CAN be spotted, I figure, why not use what works?