this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
904 points (98.4% liked)
Gaming
6209 readers
377 users here now
!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.
Our Rules:
1. Keep it civil.
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.
2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.
I should not need to explain this one.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.
Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Logo uses joystick by liftarn
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Games, like movies, are easily consumed but difficult to create. As a result, everyone and their grandma can critique them and publish on the Internet which only further self-selects for the highly opinionated to do so.
But not all opinions are equal. You can be well studied in your field and generally intelligent, but if you don't have a relevant background in the humanities and the sciences, you can have complex reasoning but without having the depth, the breadth, and the relevance in the analysis.
Case in point the first replier. The analogy is fine and the deductive reasoning is self-consistent, but they didn't show the relevance to game design. (Ie. Why must the author make the text size bigger for people who can't enjoy smaller text, and why must the same apply to games.)
That's why gamers seem to be notorious for having takes that miss the trees for the forest.
(I am aware that I'm very much at risk of committing this very error with my post.)
Exactly. Not all opinions are equal. If you suck at games, you shouldn't even get an opinion, you should get a different hobby.
I'm not disagreeing with you. But that's the thing, being good at a game isn't even an important qualification for insightful analysis which is why gamers tend to make poor takes.
The important qualifications are experience and formal knowledge in the arts and some of the sciences. The YouTuber Noah Caldwell-Gervais is a good example. The guy sucks ass at twitch mechanics (ie. playing games) but he's extremely well-read and has extensive knowledge on many domains so he makes insightful analysis.
Miyazaki doesn't even play his own games and probably sucks just as much ass at twitch mechanics but he's able to consistently direct amazing games because of his extensive knowledge and experience apart from playing well.