this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32219 readers
653 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It seems they also have a tendency to consider NATO as cartoons villains. Also, tankies are not the average lefties, they are at the extreme of the left.

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems they also have a tendency to consider NATO as cartoons villains

If NATO did not want to be considered cartoon villains, they shouldn't be so cartoonishly evil.

[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to be under some kind of belief that people should be ashamed of an accurate assessment of NATO, and that it is some sort of mistake to stand by it. This is weird

[–] Emu@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NATO does more good than ruZZia for the world

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What good does it do? When was the last time they did good? The current Russian state and NATO can both burn as far as I'm concerned.

[–] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait so are tankies anti-NATO? All leftists are anti-NATO lmao

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Tankies are more specifically pro-dictatorship and pro-oligarchy so long as the countries claim to be Communist.

[–] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

gaddafi was sodomized to death with a knife. i can hardly think of a more cartoonishly evil organization.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] StalinForTime@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Gaddafi was also certainly killed based on French intelligence, and there is substantial evidence that the men who assassinated him were French assets. Part of the reason, apart from the broader geopolitical aim of annihilating a country which wanted to engage in the construction of international monetary and commerical systems outside of the orbit and control of the American petro-dollar, Gaddafi had essentially bribed Sarkozy at a certain point and was holding this over the latter's head (Sarkozy is infamously corrupt). See:

Hegemon's have to rule by fear. Read any bloodsoaked page from the history of the Roman Empire. Fear is best instilled through unimaginable atrocity. What do you think the rulers of the rest of Africa and the Middle East thought after they saw how Gaddafi, head of the most prosperous (per-capita, quality of life, standard of living, etc.) state in Africa, ended up?

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

By his people, yes. Not sure what that has to do with NATO or even why that was a bad thing.

Funny and horrific ends for genocidal dictators is overall a good thing.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

"Cartoon villain" here means "a villain who is just intrinsically evil and does evil things as a result." Contrast this with real people, who generally have material or ideological motivational for the actions they take.

The left views NATO as evil not because it's full of cartoon villains, but because it is an organization that consciously, due to material and ideological motivations, chooses to immiserate the global south for the benefit of its constituent countries' ruling classes.

[–] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use it similarly to what is described in this Wikipedia article, in particular the last paragraph of the introduction is what disturbs me the most with some Lemmy users. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

[–] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The last paragraph quotes fucking Ross Douthat, come on now

Lots of terms need defining. "Illiberal" just means not capitalistic, which yeah that's all leftists. What is authoritarian? Usually a definition that gets thrown around applies more to capitalist countries vs those listed.

So it's just a western communist that supports non Western communist projects? 🤔

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's essentially cope for them not just supporting "nominally" socialist countries because their stance is one of anti-imperialism. Iran should have nukes.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't Putin's invasion of Ukraine and the Russo-Georgian war imperialism? I still don't get them, except being blinded by their hate of USA's war crimes, which I can understand, but it still seems like an irrational conclusion to become a tankie. They end up supporting or refusing to criticize regimes that generate similar war crimes.

[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

the Russo-Georgian war imperialism

Wait, are you saying Saakashvili has done an imperialism? Because even western/EU reports have confirmed that Georgia started that war, not Russia.

They end up supporting or refusing to criticize regimes that generate similar war crimes.

"From 24 February 2022, which marked the start of the large-scale armed attack by the Russian Federation, to 30 July 2023, OHCHR recorded 26,015 civilian casualties in the country: 9,369 killed and 16,646 injured"

Almost 10 thousand civilians killed is horrible. But compare this to Iraq: it's less than the first month of the war in Iraq, and no US politicians was tried for war crimes. Maybe you should ponder this factoid.

If you live in a NATO country maybe you should demand Blair and Bush to be tried for their war crimes. If you live in the west you should spend more energy of criticizing the ruling class above you.

"supporting or refusing to criticize" This is a made up leftist. Per definition there is no leftist that uncritically supports a right wing capitalist country.