this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
727 points (98.7% liked)

World News

50630 readers
2908 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rule of law is obviously sympathetic to Hamas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 62 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

following orders

Now what does that remind of...

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 46 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Every military ever.

The concept that a soldier is able to disobey an illegal order is flawed. The first thing that happens to them is being thrown in jail awaiting court martial. It's then on them to prove the order illegal be ause the presumption is that it was legal. It becomes one person against the whole military apparatus.

The penalty if found guilty of refusing to obey orders? At minimum (in the US) a dishonorable discharge. At most a room on death row.

I still think soldier should refuse illegal orders, but the system is setup so they don't.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Well we just have to make sure the consequences for obeying orders to commit war crimes are worse than what their superiors can dish out for disobeying those orders.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

The US has no draft, they choose to join, so they can go fuck themselves.
Assassins paid with taxpayer money, that's all they are.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

I for one am 100% done with giving soldiers any grace on these matters.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You should update your minimum. In the US military It’s actually an NJP to start. You can request court martial if desired and it goes from there.
Dishonorable discharge is very rare and you’re likely to end up with an OTH or BCD if the “infraction” is significant. I’d rather have some jail time than shoot civilians tbh.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Not even an NJP if you're a Nuke. I've told admirals to their face that I wasn't going to break the book to follow their stupid orders. I realize we are the prima donnas of the military though, and I wasn't just a Nuke.

[–] facelessbs@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Navy Nuclear Power Program Member

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

It’s someone who works on a nuclear powered ship. You have to take extra tests to get on a nuke and they only allow the smartest ASVAB scores to take the test.

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 11 points 21 hours ago

You always have a choice.