this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
84 points (95.7% liked)

Computer RPG Games

519 readers
200 users here now

Community for CRPG games and other RPG gaming discussions. Witcher, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Baldurs Gate as well as indie RPGs (Underrail, Avernum, Space Wreck etc.). Focus is on CRPGs, but discussion around JPRGs, ARPGs and hybrid games with RPG components is also welcome.

Tabletop/pen & paper RPG discussion is not a good fit for this community. Check out !rpg@ttrpg.network for TT/P&P RPG discussions.

Memes are not banned, but the overwhelming focus is on discussions, releases and articles. Try and post memes (on an occasional basis) that would make people who don't like memes admit "OK! That was a good one!".


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or NSFW content (no games with NSFW images/video).

  4. Please stay on topic, cRPG adjacent games or even JRPGs are fine. Try to include topics / games that have a strong roleplaying component to them.


Some other gaming communities across Lemmy:


Game-specific communities on Lemmy:

Thank you to macniel for the community icon!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] tty5@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Correct, the law was on his side. If he was offered the 10k he initially took and not it being a result of his demands I would be on his side as well. He opted for the less risky option - a flat fee - and because of that I don't believe he was morally entitled to the higher, more risky payment structure he flat out refused to consider. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

[โ€“] FelixCress@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago

I don't believe he was morally entitled to the higher

Fortunately, the law disagrees with you and protects the artist, not corporations.