this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
95 points (92.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8603 readers
308 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

shouldn’t someone more credibly holding those positions run?

Maybe, but Democrats are running an 80 year-old conservative who's a-okay with your family starving to fund a billionaire's yacht instead.

Platner's problem isn't the shitposting, as the last 30 years of Democratic politics have shown demonstrably that Dems and their voters don't care about war, brown people, genocide, or war crimes. His problem is he never expected to run for office and therefore didn't delete his socials.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe,

why maybe and not obviously yes?

but Democrats are running an 80 year-old conservative

they're also running a 41 year old murder enthusiast who is larping as a progressive, and they're bolstering his credibility by pretending to fear his policies. it's called hedging.

His problem is he never expected to run for office and therefore didn’t delete his socials.

You think the problem is that he didn't delete is socials? (He actually did delete them and hoped to get away with it, it's just that reddit archives exist and someone leaked his username to CNN.)

I think the problem is actually that (in his own words) he "wanted to have an adventure and kill some people. Joined up in ‘04, did Fallujah and Ramadi, and managed both."