Superbowl
For owls that are superb.
Also visit our twinned community for wholesome content:
!wholesome@reddthat.com
US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now
International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com
Australia Rescue Help: WIRES
Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org
If you find an injured owl:
Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.
Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.
Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.
If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.
For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.
view the rest of the comments


 
          
          
I blame the phlogiston.
I had never heard of phlogiston before this. Had a fun read on the history, and now I'm wondering what will be the phlogiston of this era.
Phlogiston is a great one. I mean we had aether theory, and we had phrenology, and we had Lamarckism (which, surprisingly enough, has had a comeback in recent decades, but interpreted and explained through the lens of evolutionary theory).
Honestly, likely things like dark matter or dark energy will be hot candidates for total revision in the coming decades, I think, but it's not really the same ideologically driven ad-hoc theorizing as, say, Lysenkoism, so I'm not sure.
We do have people actively refusing science, not even reverting it or believing outdated practices, but simply rejecting it as in the case of flat earthers ("flerfers"), and I think that is probably as close as you get today- except, with the previous ones, at least they came from actual scientific inquiries that turned out to be wrong, where FET is just random anti-scientific fundamentalism for no particular reason.
¯\(ツ)/¯
I always wonder about dark matter and quantum mechanics, mainly due to the fact that I can't get my brain to wrap around any of how the leading authorities talk about it, but even if they are right about it, we still know next to zip about it compared to other sciences, so that sounds like a good candidate for us to be very wrong about.
And I don't look down on the ignorance we have of things beyond our comprehension, it's actually assuring to see how coming from things like Lamarckism and humorism, and we have been improving the scientific method and how we approach the development of theories. It feels we've got science to a point where we're ok saying we don't know this or that, which sounds much more helpful than just taking a stab at it and going with it for a few centuries.
The anti-science folk I don't feel are the same. That feels like more outright rejecting of evidence and going on vibes rather than just treating a hypothesis as something more proven than it really is. Even with the louder voice and means of reinforcement we've given the anti-science crowd, there are still more people that are using our modern methods of communicating and sharing knowledge over distance to do good work. We're closer to another Dark Age than I'd like with the path some world leaders are tiptoeing on, but humans are still discovering and inventing and beginning to understand so much every day.