this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
803 points (98.4% liked)
Funny
12256 readers
1696 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just turn it in again and say AI summarized it
I actually tried using both ChatGPT and Claude for that and the document made both of them literally cry and give up. ChatGPT pretty much said "nah, man, i'm good" and peaced out straight away. Homie didn't even tried and I'm loving it. Claude started the transcription and two charts in told me that this fucking consumer data shit is too dense and gave up mid number 3. In the end - I just showed the results and the client gave up on AI summary too.
Humans:"They're gonna replace us."
AI:"Glue on pizza."
at least glue on pizza is some silly shit. when your "trusty" AI assistant starts saying some silly shit like "you don't need in-app chat function because it is not cost-efficient, use Viber instead" when it's a finance app - and the client insists that it's a good idea even though it is just not - that's all you need to know about AI capabilities.
Yeah, I hate em clankers. No, wait, actually, I hate the users. Some of them. The moronic ones.
these are the worst but the case studies are fun to compile. every time you think "well, that's gotta be it - the peak of human stupidity" - you get another thing coming