news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.
If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.
Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.
Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.
Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.
Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.
view the rest of the comments

Random internet commenters and forums are not "influencers". This applies to people building a brand as video personalities, not to random conversation between individuals. If it applied to forum discussion nobody would be able to talk about personal health experiences or offer one another support for health related problems at all.
It's easy to class identify this, influencers are petty bourgoeiosie (or aspire to be) building brands to seek profit while everyone that isn't an influencer is just working class.
This policy is misguided. China could simply pass a law against being wrong on the internet.
ok entirely on me for associating influencer with something like pghrt.diy
Don't get me wrong I think it's possibly to misapply this kind of thing if arseholes are malicious about it. I just don't think that's very likely with China outside of fringe occurrences. And we both know that those fringe occurrences aren't actually going to affect underground communities like that other than forcing them to move things around a bit.
The important thing to understand here is that an influencer is different to random individuals talking to one another. Randoms don't have audiences they are true subcultures of people. Influencers are media brands that hold very little difference to a television channel or a newspaper. Just because they have the appearance of being amateur due to only having 1 face of the brand doesn't mean they shouldn't be regulated just as hard, particularly when they have audiences that are bigger than most newspapers or tv channels.