this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
114 points (97.5% liked)

technology

24078 readers
264 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FuckBigTech347@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

hyprland isn't "suckless" at all. Even a normal person will go "wow this sucks" at the sight of the hyprland codebase and the way they do things.
Most of the "suckless" software has the benefit of depending on old, massive X11 swiss knife libs that haven't really changed in the last 30+ years and are available on most UNIX-like Systems, which makes compiling it from source trivial.
If X was still under active development then all the "suckless" software would only be "suckless" on OpenBSD, because those guys have their own fork of X11 that hasn't been touched since the end of the 2nd Century.

[โ€“] hello_hello@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

I mean the issue I take with suckless is that it still can suckmore. X11 as a toolkit library and as the base for a xorg server window manager impl is just treating X as a load bearing dependency.

But besides that, I think people took the wrong lesson from suckless and thought it just meant "less = more." So we get projects like hyprland that think they're superior because they have less "bloat" or whatever.

In a not too distant future, GNOME will be more suckless than DWM and the suckless folks dont actually care to learn why.