this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
737 points (87.0% liked)
memes
17984 readers
2594 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Im an anarcho communist and i can not fucking stand tankies. Especially the vangaurd dipshits
Anarcho communism...anarchosyndicalism...Christ I wanna take all these obfuscations, crumple them into a ball of just plain anarchy, and burn it. No offense of course!
Yeah, it just helps filter the madness. Anarcho capitalists still consider themselves anarchists even though they are fucking stupid
Well I guess nothing causes chaos quite like that 🤑
As a side note, I've only done very little Wikipedia level reading on anarchocommunism, and as much as I also believe people help each other willingly, I've yet to hear a good defence on how it would be possible with the massive populations we have now, as opposed to pre-history.
It's all well and good that there are federated groups, with free association, but this is fundamentally ignoring that not all regions are equally blessed in resources.
If you have money, well then you need a centralised or decentralised way of miniting the money.
If you don't have money, well, I don't think it's much of a stretch to think that people will want to take care more of the people immediately around them, rather than people on the other side of the world, and since we're not getting together on large scales to make binding decisions, then there's no way to guarantee that everyone has a fair share.
I'm not saying that more decentralised government wouldn't work, but I do remain thoroughly unconvinced that free association of small groups across the entire world, would lead to much equity at all.
And as much as we may dream, there WILL be dickheads ruining it for the rest of us. Humans are nice, but humans can also be awful. Pretending otherwise is foolish and doomed to failure.
I'm a socialist, and am very keen to hear your thoughts :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_without_adjectives
You know what's cute?
Watching Anarcosyndicalists argue vehemently with Anarchocapitalists
I really rather not argue with 'ancaps', it's a meme ideology that is completely fine with a dictatorship of capital.
here's my favorite writeup from an 'ancap' after one such exchange:
spoiler
I stopped reading here. Molyneux is an open white supremacist; Cantwell is more well-known as "the Crying Nazi"
Anyone consuming their content regularly and posting to these blogs shares much more ideologically with the Third Reich than they do with any notion of tolerant diverse civil society.
my experience with US libertarians is that they're all like that just under the surface
You do understand how tribal and insular this is, and how much you are playing into exactly the us-versuss-them dynamic that you purport to hate?
just stating my experience with them as I've known many over the years, the ones who are actually earnest stop being ancaps/libertarians
There has also been a persistent demographic trend for young socialists to grow up to become middle-age fiscal conservatives.
This does not mean "they" are "all like that"
hey if you're right then maybe someday I'll get to meet a libertarian that isn't a fashy asshole!
I'll be sure and let you know if it ever happens
This copypasta is fantastic lmao
Was that post even real though? I feel like it's been debunked.
it's so on the nose it's probably fabricated, but I still find it amusing
I'm gonna be honest, kicking the shit out of a nerd because you don't agree with his words is not as cool as you seem to think.
Sure he was "wrong," but did anyone try "please leave, we no longer wish to discuss these matters with you" before jumping to initiating violence? Multiple attackers no less (which would meet the threshold of deadly force in most states, luckily for them not Greece).
Back in my day children were taught to use their words, but I guess immature adults that are incapable of doing so still have to bully people physically, sucks to suck I guess, get eloquent losers.
counterpoint: ancaps suck and I don't care about people being mean to them
Sure, then again tankies suck but I don't think people should initiate violence against them for their words, I'll just argue or cut comtact. Guess that's what makes me better than you.
They're not arguing for racism and capitalism to continue though but you can do what you like and I'll continue to laugh at the copypasta
But they are denying the current persecution of the uyghurs; denying the various historical atrocities like the holodomor, Tienanmen square, the katyn massacre, etc; excusing the ones they can't deny; and simping for authoritarianism. Oh and lets not forget a decent contingent of them agree with nutomic that transness is bourgoise.
So what you're saying is tankies should be violently persecuted for their words with no other provocation by people like me who disagree with them. Lucky for you, were we arguing IRL I wouldn't get violent until you do, because I'm not a piece of shit. Enjoy it all you like, and I'll judge you all I like.
Denying things that are verifiably false is normal and good
you post on sh.itjust.works despite the admin there being transphobic, maybe you should self-isolate from there too.
subjective assessment
Idek who the admin there is, but I'm also arguing with an .ml tankie, does that mean I'm supporting nutomic because his site is facilitating that? By interacting with the internet at all through companies like cloudflare, whatever device you use, your ISP, does that mean you support capitalism? Maybe you should self isolate from them yourself. By using a Mali TLD does that mean you support everything the Mali gov does including their arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings?
Probably not, you're probably not dumb enough to actually believe that bullshit argument you put up, you just think I am. Nice try but no dice.
Too bad you can't resort to violence because this is the internet and you have to use your words, I can see why you're prone to violence if this is the limit of your argumentative prowess.
I'm actually an anarchist tyvm
You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue; If you're going to get so bent out of shape about one person on one instance it raises the question why you're not so outspoken about other instances you use where people express the same opinions.
Me, I've been plenty outspoken about Nutomic, I've said that if he ever posts on a comm I mod I'll ban him myself.
Mmhmm I've heard that one before. If true, great.
HOLY SHIT WHO PUT THAT THERE?! Oh me. Well good, then I can continue to argue without contradicting myself, phew.
Really thought that was your slam dunk? You're really bad at this. If you were this SJW admin and we were talking about trans stuff, guess I'd still be arguing with you.
To translate it for you since you seem to be having issues differentiating violence from conversation, I was saying I'm not going to beat this admin up for saying shit I don't agree with, instead I'll either cut contact (as in not talk to them, walk away, or here "block") or (like this) argue. You'll notice I'm also not beating you up because we disagree on initiating violence. Probably because my whole argument is "that's bad."
This fun for you? It is for me lol.
I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally, but I still think it's a funny copypasta because racist nerd gets bullied in it, who knows if it's even true.
it's good that you're having fun but I don't think you made yourself any more clear to me
Coulda fooled me. Seems to be you're the one in this convo advocating for it, and as further evidence to that point you're still literally incapable of even understanding my argument all these comments later despite me literally telling you that my argument is "initiating violence is bad."
I'm gonna go with "nuh uh" on this one, I straight up do not believe you truthfully aren't a "fan" of initiating violence after having spent this entire convo advocating and excusing exactly what you claim you're not a fan of. Something tells me you enjoy it, not sure what, but I think it was you literally saying you enjoy it.
Anything's possible when you make shit up kiddo
That's what makes us civilized, and the Diva from lemmy.ml Part of the Problem, and actually an unintentional Nazi accelerant and enaber.
Ahhh... lemmy.ml; I should have known. An information bubble.
Yes it feels good an cathartic to hate on people whose ideas are perverse. Let the hate flow through you all you like; it won't turn you into one of the Good Guys.
Yes, Nazi ideology needs to be annealed, expunged, eliminated from the world in the same way that, say, chattel slavery (laregly) has been.
No, that won't happen by people beating up Nazis.
Grow up
what does annealed mean in this usage? I don't get the metaphor you're going for because the literal reading to me says you're saying that it must tempered/softened. I don't think that's an appropriate response to Nazis, it's a very soft connotation.
making fun of libertarians really struck a nerve huh
Physical violence is literally the only way to stop nazis, go read a book
Ah geez just melt my brain instead 💀
Wait until you meet the other people who hate tankies.
Tell me one (1) successful socialist revolution you support
Or, better, do you support the Spanish Civil War anarchists (who lost to fascism) more than the Bolsheviks (who won)?
Doesn't that mean you want to forcibly cease people's property at gun point and shoot them if they try to stop you? That sounds pretty fucking tankie to me.
Lmfao what a gross misunderstanding of anarchism. I assume you stopped learning after public school from a comment like that
Ok tankie
Lmao