this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
561 points (96.7% liked)

Funny

12333 readers
1423 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I never understood why this was seen as a good counterargument. I think the hedonist would say just say "yes, hook me up" assuming people aren't suffering in the real world that they would otherwise be helping. The reason for wanting to make change is if people are suffering, so if no one is suffering the hedonist would just say sign me up, no?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think that engages the argument from a hedonistic perspective it's addressing though. Prioritizing and valuing reducing suffering and helping over pleasure violates the thesis that pleasure is the ultimate good.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Reducing suffering increases global pleasure, as can helping people.