this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
884 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

27113 readers
1518 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] felbane@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] rainwall@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, Terraform or it's FOSS fork would be ideal, but many of these infrastructures are setup by devs, using the "immediately in front of them" tools that each cloud presents. Decoupling everything back to neutral is the same nightmare as migrating any stack to any other stack.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Definitely. I go through that same nightmare every time I have to onboard some new acquisition whose devops was the startup cfo's nephew.

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Infrastructure is there to be used by apps/services. It doesn’t matter how it’s created if infrastructure across providers does not provide same API. You can’t use GCP storage SDK to call AWS s3. Even if API would be same, nothing guarantees consistent behavior. Just like JPA provides API but implementations and DBs behavior are inconsistent

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You can use the S3 API to interop with basically every major provider. For most core components there are either interop APIs or libraries that translate into provider-native APIs.

It's 100% doable to build a provider-agnostic stack from the iac all the way up to the application itself.