this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
332 points (99.4% liked)

News

32847 readers
2618 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A decade after a landmark study proved that feeding peanut products to young babies could prevent development of life-threatening allergies, new research finds the change has made a big difference in the real world.

Peanut allergies began to decline in the U.S. after guidance first issued in 2015 upended medical practice by recommending introducing the allergen to infants starting as early as 4 months. The rate of peanut allergies in children ages 0 to 3 fell by more than 27% after guidance for high-risk kids was first issued in 2015, and by more than 40% after the recommendations were expanded in 2017.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For fucks same, what did you think doctors a decade ago thought would happen when they started recommending this?

Did you think they just wanted to kill all the infants off?

Or do you think science works by proving a hypothesis and the vast majority of the time no one is surprised when science proves it right, except people who don't know about it?

What in the ever-loving fuck are you talking about? They issued this guidance 10 years ago after rigorous study. Which was my entire point. Why do you argue with literally everything

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In 2015, a decade ago, doctors started recommending this method...

Do you think they're shocked now?

Or do you think they only recommended it once they were confident it wouldn't just kill off a bunch of infants before they grew into children with peanut allergies?

Because to me, it seems like we knew what would happen

And the only people surprised it worked, were ignorant up until now about what doctors have been recommending for a decade?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you point to these "shocked" people? Are these "surprised" people in the room with you now?

The 2015 study was only even possible because the guidelines had changed in 2008. The guidelines were changed in 2008 only after significant research was conducted. You think these guidelines should have been changed on a whim without doing any research about them? Ok, RFK Jr.

The study this post is about? Literally no one except you is "shocked" that scientists would want to measure the effect this guidance has had on mortality and morbidity. Please stop forcefully pretending like you understand science.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So...

You agree with me that the only people surprised, were ignorant of stuff that had been widely discussed for over a decade...

What exactly is your issue here?

You're mad I said something you agreed with?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your initial statement was pompous and dismissive of the thousands of physicians who have contributed to this medical guidance. It's also dismissive of the reality that there are still infants who develop severe peanut allergies and for whom this method does not work, which is why high risk individuals should still only do this under medical supervision.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Your initial statement was pompous and dismissive of the thousands of physicians who have contributed to this medical guidance

Why would you think they're ignorant of this if they worked on it?

Like, I'm starting to think all of this is because you don't know what "ignorant" means and think it's an insult and not literally the natural state...

No one knows everything, and everyone's ignorant of some stuff.

That's just life bro.

But I'm glad I figured it out

You were just ignorant of what ignorance means...

Which is honestly pretty funny