this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
329 points (97.4% liked)

News

32847 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blave@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What upsets me the most about this, aside from the dead babies, is that the only reason this sort of lunacy has suddenly become extremely popular is because certain people have suddenly figured out how to make a ton of money on it. The biggest impetus behind all of this is its profitability, not any ideology.

And, I think that the people who are fighting against this kind of bullshit often overlook that.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

For me it’s the politicians. There will always be a few misguided souls but the politicians who manipulate their concerns are the real evil. They know what they’re doing, they know the consequences, but greed for power and sociopathic tendencies means they don’t care.

It’s not that there are nutcases but the new focus on manipulating them brings it all out in the open and spreads it like bed bugs

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Besides the tiny coffin industry, where is the money in anti-vax?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 17 hours ago

When the pandemic was at full force, i worked for some lady tgat did foot massages. At least that's what i gathered from what it said on her car. But she saw herself more as a doctor or even super doctor than someone who rubs feet.

I often heard her on the phone telling people/customers/future customers to not get vaccinated becase you get shingles from it, vaccines are the real illness, autism, whatever. Instead they should just massage it away. I don't even think she was straight up scamming people, she just lived on Facebook, or a bit of both. Her customers more often than not took her advice very seriously. I know that because they often gave me a weird look because i was wearing a mask and they would deliberately hug and talk really closely without masks when i was around.

I worked for one of her customers not too long ago, pure coincidence. She has long covid now, she can't walk up the stairs anymore without being out of breath. She told me she has long covid, while also explaining me that she doesn't believe in covid.

I kinda forgot where i was going, but some people just have to believe what they want to believe.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Supplements. Iodine, colloidal silver, sea moss, and methylene blue. Completely unregulated "cures" for everything from the common cold to erectile disfunction. And if it doesnt work clearly you took the wrong dose or are possessed by demons.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Radium water used to sold as a cure all until it rotted out the jaw of a rich guy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radithor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eben_Byers

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh hey Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson have joined the chat!

[–] thepompe@ttrpg.network 2 points 16 hours ago

Yes, it's also a talking point for the entertainers to appease their tribe.

What's your bright spot today, buddy?

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Selling a fuck ton of snake-oil as an alternative.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

They aren't mad at the pharma industry so much as they are mad they aren't getting a piece of the pie.

[–] blave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Going viral on social media. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok… YouTube, too. If you start getting a certain number of views per hour or views per day, they start paying you for it because of the ads that play during your videos.

Making insane bullshit that gets a lot of clicks and views is an extremely profitable industry, especially if you’re some idiot who is otherwise unemployable. This is why all of those crazy AI slop videos are suddenly very popular, because if you post ones that go viral, they get a lot of affiliate rewards from all of the views and add impressions. Basically, that translates into cash.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Based on the comments a lot of idiots take the AI slop videos and ads seriously.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Reduced short term costs. Vaccines aren't free and operate on a fairly slim profit margin.

More customers in higher profit services. Emergency, surgical and palliative care have significantly higher profits especially since chargemasters are largely given a blank check on which to write the charges on.

"But surely this is bad for the insurance industry who will push against this." Nope! The biggest obstacle to them raising rates is that to avoid any legal pushback there needs to be something to point at for why their costs increase. Insurance rates will, and currently are, going to rise significantly faster than any payouts.

This isn't some "Alex jones conspiracy" it's the entirely predictable outcome of a privatized healthcare system and is only going to get worse. The Alex Jones types are taking advantage of the crisis by selling snake oil cures for it, but they aren't a primary driver of the problem.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This. If we had normal FTC that would go after.

[–] blave@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, although, even with my decades of experience and media literacy, if I were made the chairman of the FTC today, I know that it would, unquestionably, take a decade or more for the FTC to modernize. And by that, I mean, it would take at least that long for the FTC to come to really understand how modern social media works, and how it, under the constitution, really should (and should not) be regulated.

I fully support the FTC being a regulatory body that, to a constitutional degree, regulates communications on the Internet. But what does that mean? What are the limits of that? What is and is not constitutional? It’s gonna take at least a decade before we even have a conceptual framework for it, and then many decades after that of evolution, just as the medium, itself, evolves.

For me, right now, the priority is to get this process started. Currently, a lot of of the FTC is not only struggling with its own existence, but how they can maintain their own current operations under Trump’s chainsaw slashing of federal workforce.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you confusing the federal trade commission and the federal communications commission?

The FTC probably has little say here, they're largely focused on finance and stocks

The FCC really shouldn't have the power to regulate speech because they can do drastic chilling of it when they can, using things like removing broadcast rights.

The FDA (food and drug administration) on the other hand and possibly even the DEA (drug enforcement agency) should be dealing with a lot of the things associated with quackery. Antivax is tied to quackery such as homeopathy. The fact things like mms (miracle mineral solution- bleach to drink as a cure all) and homeopathy are able to spread and be sold is a sign of regulatory failure

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The biggest impetus behind all of this is its profitability, not any ideology.

Yes and no: to many, including most of the most powerful people in the US in particular and the world in general, "fuck everyone else, I want more money and/or power right now" IS their foundational ideology.

It's like Ayn Rand, but with less grandiose justifications and even more "might makes right" and victim blaming.

In other words, a particularly toxic mix of fascism and anarcho-capitalism.

[–] blave@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OK, I think the most useful thing I can say right now is that, while you are not wrong in the archetypes that caused the problem that let us here, there are a lot more contemporaneous nuances to the problem, and which complicate any possible solutions than there used to be. Put simply, wow, very used to be your problem. That was once black and white, it is now not simply shades of gray, but it is the shades of grey on multiple dimensions.

So, it’s a similar problem, but one which affects many more people than anyone realized, previously, and then so many more complicated ways that we, even as an entire society, are struggling with trying to figure out exactly what they all mean, let alone how to deal with the problems that present themselves.

And while that is quite its own thing, what truly differentiates the progressive from the regressive is the willingness to both acknowledge that this is happening, along with the willingness to acknowledge that it must be dealt with in the terms of a public service and good, rather than a private corporate need right for exploitation.

Edit: even as we continue, discuss this, my point becomes clear: whenever intuitive degree this issue occurs, it is an extraordinarily nuanced and complicated situation which requires at least as nuanced and complicated solutions. Nothing is black-and-white. There is no one simple answer to anything.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Money is part of it but I do believe it's an ideology. You've long had the grifters and con artists selling snake oil and other flim flams, but the ideology here is why people buy in.

People have completely lost trust in authorities. In the US its current form really goes back to the Vietnam War and its destruction of Johnson's great society project. But since then American culture has grown increasingly distrustful of the government and it's been a major tool of the republican party (despite nixon) as a means to sway support for deregulation after the new deal era of the government actually radically improving lives. This has spread over to all institutions, especially medical ones. (Honorable mention to things like the tuskeegee syphilis experiment and the cia using vaccine programs to run DNA tests)

Grifters and quacks have encouraged it, but it's reasonable that they're distrustful, they're questioning authority. It's just that they're doing it unreasonably and against overwhelming evidence. There's a whole bunch of fallacies and fears as well as being sheltered from the reality of disease (then doubling down when facing it). But the ideology is crucial here