this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
789 points (98.3% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

5267 readers
4 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Population Density in the United States vs Europe

I mean I'd love more trains in the US, but let's not oversimplify.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All the more reason we need high speed rail.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, China might be a better comparison than Europe ironically.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

No matter what comparison you pick people will complain that it isn't applicable.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So the eastern half of the USA should at least have more trains than Scandinavia per square km, and the coasts should be like France. Doesn't seem oversimplified at all.

[–] hilljack26301@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So Ohio has the same population density as France. France has the TGV and Ohio has?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

Racists, mostly.

Manly men in coal rolling trucks?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

Reminder that the US had a much denser rail network in the past.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine how Europe’s population density looked before the railways…

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So 200 years ago? I think everywhere was less populous.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

Then railways brought about the invention of regional specialty industries, the suburbs, and the commuter.