this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
599 points (94.4% liked)

People Twitter

8386 readers
845 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sudo@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Tbh Biden could've shut them up pretty easily by not spending tax payer money on genocide. Sounds like the best of both worlds to me.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Why does everyone assume that this would have won the election for Democrats?

In fact, I keep being told that there weren't enough protest non-voters to sway the election for Trump. Just completely contradictory.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago

There's absolutely way more simply apathetic non-voters who saw two candidates promising more austerity and genocide and said "shits fucked yo" and didn't bother. You can call those people stupid but you'd be dumber for thinking that will get them to vote for your candidate.

If anything the uncommitted campaign was warning about that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Why does everyone assume that this would have won the election for Democrats?

Because genocide supporting centrists keep blaming the anti-genocide left for harris' loss.