I know how they'd define one, but the question in my mind when it comes up is specifically how the accusers would define one. Because along with there being a difference between going by a conventional definition and going by a modified one, there is also a difference between having your own modified definition and it just being vague.

It's why, when I criticize many of these people, I don't use the word "fascist". I just use the words that come to mind when I first think of what kind of individual they are. I don't even use the word "terrorist" half the time for the same reason, I just describe them based on direct adjectives for the act itself. "Mass murderer" seems completely fine.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The word terrorist is pretty functionally useless. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist, but a fascist is a fascist. The word might be badly misused from time to time, but the but the whole MAGA enterprise is without question a fascist movement.

You mentioned Joe Rogan elsewhere. If Rogan is interviewing a fascist, then Rogan is a fascist. If Rogan is interviewing a socialist, then he is a socialist. He's just a mid-wit echo chamber who got captured by a right wing audience. I think he finally figured out that he fucked up, but can't figure out how to escape without losing his whole audience.

[–] Voidist@midwest.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It might help if he had a co-host.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 3 days ago

It's not like he couldn't afford one. He was just chasing the money. His listeners didn't want accurate facts, and neither did his sponsors.