this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
40523 readers
259 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
right after fusion power goes commercial, which also will power it all
I was expecting more progress after the two big fusion times recently. My question now is what is limiting these reactions.
So far as I'm aware, magnetic fields. But that's for the best ... uncontrolled fusion doesn't sound like a good path forward.
Technically correct, but in this case I'm wondering what is stopping fusion from continuing longer than about 20 minutes.
Is it like rail gun technology, where the hardware fails after so much use and there is no realistic way to keep it in tolerance?
Are we having trouble keeping a balance between fuel and the reaction, causing it to fizzle out or breach containment?
Is the fuel actually too expensive?
Is all this ok and we are now stuck with a scaling issue where the reaction can sustain itself, but we can't actually use it to boil more than a kettle.
it's straight up still not good enough