this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
469 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58889 readers
3548 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also have to subscribe to and use Adobe software but suggesting it's less buggy and less expensive than other apps is delusional.

The moment you try and do anything outside of basic image editing, Photoshop immediately shits the bed.

It's riddled with features that were half developed or half removed. Tried using any of the 3D stuff? It pops up a box saying "We've abandoned this and it probably won't work, but go ahead and try because we haven't properly removed it". Using artboards? Probably not, since half the app seems to break with them, including their brand new features like Live Gradients that rearrange themselves when you save.

Looking for a filter? Well there's 2 places to look since they seem to have lost interest in the filter gallery half way through, then piled mediocre AI filters on top. It'll be a slow search, since for some reason some popup windows take fully 3 seconds to open, probably due to their 4 different UI systems in various states of abandoned.

Photoshop is widely used today because it was good 15 years ago. If someone hasn't already creating a leaner, more stable, better designed, more ambitious piece of software, it's only a matter of time until they do.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Delusional? I'm sure you just mean to capture my attention, but you dont have to try like that.

I'm not here to defend Adobe or praise their products. For the last 2 years I have done my best to get rid of them and finally, about a month ago I conceded and payed for the subscription again.

Let me tell you, there is no software (none, 0), that can do half what photoshop can do and is less buggy. That doesn't say, photoshop or any other Adobe product is not buggy and doesn't have issues, it's just a fact there is no competition.

I say that completely confidently and with no delusion anywhere.

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hmm. I was about to wade in on this one but fair enough.

Personally, I’m probably not enough of a power user to need the sort of functionality you do but I said ‘Fuck Adobe’ some years ago and never looked back.

I am, however, still on the hunt for a decent replacement for Aperture.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Good luck. Really, I hope you find something. I'm working on these products for hours daily, I can't afford to use something that will increase that time.

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes. Bought the whole package. I decided that this is the software for me and tried to use it. After two months, I gave up. It's not bad, it's just not as good. It just takes an extra click here and there, a function less here and there, an illogical here and there and that culminates to my work being done slower and me being annoyed. Affinity designer being the worst, missing auto tracing and messing up svg exports.

Not to mention the new generative ai functions that are now natively in Adobe products. That's literal gold. You can't be a serious designer and not use that. That saves up so much time, it's not possible to not have. Not possible. Adobe won. We can cry about it and whine, but they won. To bad, but it is what it is.

And the subscription price. It's easy to get 50% off on deals for the whole package. That's about 35 per month. That is a negligible. That's like less than an hour of work on a freelancers hourly rate.

[–] dreamer@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What I don't understand about people who say things like there are alternatives and point to open source software. Like I understand that most people have used nothing but Adobe since forever, but have you even tried using alternatives for actual work? It's a frustrating experience.

[–] NoiseColor@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Yes! It's just not as good and more importantly, it's not good enough. At first I thought it's because I'm not as familiar, but no, they are just not set up as good as Adobe. That's the bottom line. Why waste time.