this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
70 points (96.1% liked)

World News

37962 readers
577 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • All the elements are in place for a strike inside Venezuela

  • Diplomatic relations with Venezuela have been broken since 2019.

  • In 2020, the US indicted President Maduro for narco-terrorism, placing a $15 million bounty on him, subsequently raised to $25m and now $50m.

  • On January 20, Trump took office. Executive Order 14157 declared a “national emergency” and designated international drug-trafficking groups as “foreign terrorist organizations” (FTOs) and “specially designated global terrorists,” citing authority under the Alien Enemies Act.

  • By February, Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that FTOs posed an “existential threat” and laid the groundwork for treating cartels allegedly linked to President Maduro as enemy combatants.

  • In May, the administration opened the path to use military force against FTOs.

  • Then in July, a “secret directive” authorized military operations against FTOs at sea and on foreign soil.

  • By August, the US launched a massive naval deployment off the coast of Venezuela. By October, troop deployment reportedly reached 10,000.

  • On September 2, the US blew up the first of four or five alleged drug boats in international waters off of Venezuela, resulting in extrajudicial murders of the crews.

  • By mid-September, the Pentagon notified Congress under the War Powers Resolution that US forces were engaged in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels.

  • This was followed on October 1 by the Defense Department’s “confidential memo” and more congressional briefings that the US was engaged in armed conflict.

  • Trump then terminated the last back-channel diplomatic contacts with Venezuela.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Headlines shouldn’t end with a question mark. When I see a headline with a question mark, it screams to me that it is click bait and not worth reading.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well you wanted to be snarky about the shitty article so I’m telling you

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's a succinct article that lays out a timeline of events so we can better discuss the possibility of invasion. It takes care of the basics, so we can move to the geopolitical. How much can the US escalate? How much is bluster? How much of the bluster is so politically insane that it must be followed through on? There is a reason General MacArthur never became president.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Then don’t use a click bait headline if you want people to take it seriously

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's remarkable that you think there is some sort of point to be made about how it's good you don't click before commenting, and I will take it seriously. You seem crabby and have nothing to add, so please go away.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There is a point. It could have had a decent title and I would have read it and we could have engaged in more meaningful discussion but alas, here we are debating clickbait titles. You seem defensive, I wonder why.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, it could not have had a title that fit your imaginary posting standards. That would have required me to either share them, or intuit and care about them. The post would then go against /c/worldnews rules against editorializing in title text. You did read those before quadrupling down, right?

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why are you sharing shitty articles then?

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

First of all, you probably still don't even know if the article is shitty, you lazybones. You're not my editor, so my posts will never meet your imaginary posting standards. Especially now that you're blocked for being so annoying after being given far too much magnaminity. 😮‍💨

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Well you put it out to the public so expect some criticism. Especially when it’s clickbait bullshit.