this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
399 points (95.0% liked)

memes

17723 readers
1840 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You know, it's like you're walking through the forest, enjoying its beauty, and then you don't notice how a hungry bear attacks you, even though you were warned about it.

What a shame, when the trap snaps it will be very painful...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't feel this analogy works, when you think about it. What's the "trap"? People trying to control what others say? That's always been the case. And if I knew about it decades ago, I should have... what? Not expressed myself freely? Nah, fuck that.

[–] lady_maria@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

my interpretation, at least:

the trap is the government (the US' in this example, perhaps) promising freedom of speech/unlawful search and seizure; but then terrorizing and inflicting violence upon those whose opinions they disagree with, but much more regularly and openly.

Those trapped think they are protected from such retaliation because they have ignored/permitted/trivialized the systemic violence against marginalized groups that has been prevalent for centuries. They ignore the signs of their country's propensity for fascism, and its intentional increase of brazenly hateful rhetoric and policies.

But they are by no means exempt, and many won't realize that until it's too late.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's fine, they can always chew their foot off.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 9 points 1 day ago

It's an allusion to chat control, banning books, etc. No good person wants that kind of control or power. But they are always misled into thinking that it's necessary somehow to protect the public or protect the children. The sort of people, they think such control and legislation would be levied against. Actively seek it out, to wield it against the people who would hinder them.