this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
66 points (95.8% liked)

World News

37962 readers
656 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • All the elements are in place for a strike inside Venezuela

  • Diplomatic relations with Venezuela have been broken since 2019.

  • In 2020, the US indicted President Maduro for narco-terrorism, placing a $15 million bounty on him, subsequently raised to $25m and now $50m.

  • On January 20, Trump took office. Executive Order 14157 declared a “national emergency” and designated international drug-trafficking groups as “foreign terrorist organizations” (FTOs) and “specially designated global terrorists,” citing authority under the Alien Enemies Act.

  • By February, Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued that FTOs posed an “existential threat” and laid the groundwork for treating cartels allegedly linked to President Maduro as enemy combatants.

  • In May, the administration opened the path to use military force against FTOs.

  • Then in July, a “secret directive” authorized military operations against FTOs at sea and on foreign soil.

  • By August, the US launched a massive naval deployment off the coast of Venezuela. By October, troop deployment reportedly reached 10,000.

  • On September 2, the US blew up the first of four or five alleged drug boats in international waters off of Venezuela, resulting in extrajudicial murders of the crews.

  • By mid-September, the Pentagon notified Congress under the War Powers Resolution that US forces were engaged in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels.

  • This was followed on October 1 by the Defense Department’s “confidential memo” and more congressional briefings that the US was engaged in armed conflict.

  • Trump then terminated the last back-channel diplomatic contacts with Venezuela.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

To the people saying this will be like Vietnam: that was a conflict between the rising mightiest superpower the world has ever seen and an agrarian economy that has undergone colonial occupation that had brought it to its knees, the superpower still lost. The current US may be stronger militarily on paper but on every other respect it is in decline (there is a possibility the US military is in decline as well but we cannot see it). I don't think an attack on Venezuela will go well for the US, in fact a full blown war could be the catalyst that shows the superpower's weaknesses more than anything else.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not declined military, but there have been a real significant shift to special forces. I think these groups will still be utilized for foreign industry interest. It's pretty effective.

Ironically, assuming we don't destroy our own infrastructure, a modern police state might better fit for the lionshare of US military. Lack of infrastructure and basic services were a huge part of the reconstruction or whatever failing in both states. Plus air superiority just comes free.

Anti-insurgency and occupation are really the only thing the military at large has proved itself capable of supporting.

I don't think we have the capacity to invade hold, and strip mine Venezuela, but with Europe looking East, I guess we could shift to a wartime economy and make it a project.

[–] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, a military economy is a very likely scenario. The religious nutjobs the US ~~got handed as a government by its economic elite~~ elected do admire Russia so perhaps will imitate it economically...