People Twitter

8370 readers

1598 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1285

Blood is blue until exposed to oxygen (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 5 days ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

182 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Glad AI is finally taking us back to an era of disinformation

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Back?

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I haven't really seen a huge shift in the volume of misinformation. Sure, the topics and delivery methods have changed, but it has been a firehose this entire time.

[–] faultyproboscus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The volume has increased exponentially. With generative AI, there are thousands of "news" sites with landing pages that look better than many real local news organizations.

These sites have agendas and are able to post the same story across the web, written differently each time, to look like events are taking place across the country/world and all being reported on by local news orgs. It's all astroturf, as far as the eye can see.

This list from Wikipedia just barely scratches the surface: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites

And this doesn't even touch on the amount of bullshit real news orgs publish without proper investigation thanks to the 24 hour news cycle and the rush to be the first to cover a story.

Yeah, there used to be misinformation published by news organizations and people with agendas. But that used to take significant effort. Now, I can set up a fake news website and fill it with stories in an afternoon.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 5 days ago

There were tons of misinformation sites in place the moment the web existed. I was there, 6,000 years ago...

Seriously though, Fox News and all the other Murdoch owned media has been a firehouse for decades. Magazines and print media like the Weekly World News as well. On the internet the misinformation spreader set up shop early, and it was mainly the search engines that directed people to the better sources.

The main change is that the people are choosing to consume the firehose of social media.