this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
31 points (94.3% liked)

Canada

10551 readers
341 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Give me an example that's legitimate. What exactly do you think is wrong how about that.

Like this is as lazy as any r/the_donald comment. Which is also a super Astro turfed space where gauging a view based on the communities response is not the best thing to do

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean first off, lol, because what does "legitimate" even mean in your philosophical system?

Like, I dunno, Kant distinguishes between noumena and phenomena but he doesn't then say that therefore it's all a goddamn free-for-all where you can just say that lies are truth now, which seems to be your position.

Hence me saying "listen to the people telling you that you are wrong about your entire epistemic framework".

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that’s not even close to what I said. You’re mixing up epistemology with moral reasoning. I never said “lies are truth.” I said perception shapes truth in politics. There’s a difference between understanding how framing works and throwing reality out the window.

Kant separated noumena and phenomena, that’s literally the whole point. we don’t get direct access to the thing in itself. We interact with how it appears. That doesn’t mean free for all, it means we operate off perception and agreement, not perfect access to reality.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

You were talking about AI-generated (fake) videos lol