Asklemmy

50879 readers

523 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by mistermodal@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally: no & yes. For the latter, a legitimate court of law ought to laugh at this case. But that's not what he is facing.

The subject came up in conversation, so I figured I would take the temperature here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I would say that there's enough doubt about the situation that if I were on the jury, I don't think I could in good conscience find him guilty.

That being said, if the actual trial brought out really good evidence, we'll see how it goes, but from what I've seen on the news? No.