this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
774 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

76592 readers
3289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Datacenter != AI

If you are using the internet for anything with cloud storage, you are contributing to datacenter growth. And that includes nearly everyone using social media.

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Sure but energy use per datacenters was on a downward trend before ai, then it went the other way hard

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Datacenter != AI

Except the demand for new data centers is driven entirely by the capacity constraints of the current AI models.

If you are using the internet for anything with cloud storage, you are contributing to datacenter growth.

"Why are you mad at my five ton diseal SUV when you just adopted a pet chihuahua? They both emit carbon!"

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that's true. Every company uses storage, and every growing company needs more. But very few companies are training generative AIs.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every company uses storage, and every growing company needs more.

You're comparing mountains to molehills. That's before you consider improvements in storage and compression relative to demands for space, or the degree to which our storage capacity "needs" are predicated on the voracious appetite of AI models and their unwanted output. Or, for that matter, the inefficient distribution of data and proliferation of spam data that predates it.

very few companies are training generative AIs

Most US Growth Now Rides on AI—And Economists Suspect a Bubble

The expansion in demand is entirely being driven by the expansion in AI capacity.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That article doesn't say what you imply it does. Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn't mean they are training AIs.

And the distinction is critical to energy usage. Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn’t mean they are training AIs.

It's the MAG7 that's driving growth. And they're all fixated on training AI in some capacity

Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

It costs $5 for each 10s video generation, based on Azure's published rates for the first Sora model.

That's presumably a lot of energy.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

The MAG7 operate large and growing cloud services, so their datacenter costs would grow even without any AI training.

And charging $5 for a video query does not mean the query uses $5 of energy. The query is priced to recoup training costs that were already incurred.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes but data center growth prior to AI was manageable. There isn't a grid on the planet (except maybe china?) which can support the growth of AI data centers.

These people have to plan energy needs on a 10-20 year life cycle, not 2. It's the 2 that's the problem.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The bitcoin miners have hopefully dropped off because they were chewing up gobs of energy too.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I thought they were totally just using flare gas and renewables ;) 🙄

But my understanding for real is that ai data centers are just the same hardware as buttcoin but more of it and organized. The venture capitalists finally got what they wanted, blowing their wad on Nvidia.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

china is also building lots of coal plants to sustain the datacenters.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

China already has 200% the capacity relative to their demand. They've been growing solar fast enough to beat very high 8%+ electricity consumption growth last year, and can probably keep the pace.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This would be 99% of businesses at this point. Stop using AI to make memes and clickbait videos.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm perfectly fine with Lemmy being limited to 100% renewable power. Don't burn coal or LNG for me.